Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
|
作者
McCutcheon, Keir [1 ,3 ]
Vanhaverbeke, Maarten [1 ]
Pauwels, Ruben [1 ]
Dabin, Jeremie [2 ]
Schoonjans, Werner [2 ]
Bennett, Johan [1 ,3 ]
Adriaenssens, Tom [1 ,3 ]
Dubois, Christophe [1 ,3 ]
Sinnaeve, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Desmet, Walter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, Res Dosimetr Applicat, Mol, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
cardiac catheterization; cardiologists; percutaneous coronary intervention; radiation; risk; PELVIC LEAD SHIELD; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; IONIZING-RADIATION; THREEFOLD DECREASE; DOUBLE-EXPOSURE; REDUCTION; ACCESS; DETERMINANTS; INSIGHTS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009627
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Interventional cardiologists are occupationally exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation. The MAVIG X-ray protective drape (MXPD) is a commercially available light weight, lead-free shield placed over the pelvic area of patients to minimize operator radiation dose. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the MXPD during routine cardiac catheterization, including percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing operator radiation dose during cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (n=632) with or without pelvic MXPD. We measured operator radiation dose at 4 sites: left eye, chest, left ring finger, and right ring finger. The primary outcomes were the difference in first operator radiation dose (mu Sv) and relative dose of the first operator (radiation dose normalized for dose area product) at the level of the chest in the 2 groups. Results: The use of the MXPD was associated with a 50% reduction in operator radiation dose (median dose 30.5 [interquartile range, 23.0-39.7] mu Sv in no drape group versus 15.3 [interquartile range, 11.1-20.0] mu Sv in the drape group; P<0.001) and a 57% reduction in relative operator dose (P<0.001). The largest absolute reduction in dose was observed at the left finger (median left finger dose for the no drape group was 104.9 [75.7-137.4] mu Sv versus 41.9 [32.6-70.6] mu Sv in the drape group; P<0.001). Conclusions: The pelvic MXPD significantly reduces first operator radiation dose during routine cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04285944.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protective Efficacy of Plasmodium vivax Radiation-Attenuated Sporozoites in Colombian Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Arevalo-Herrera, Myriam
    Vasquez-Jimenez, Juan M.
    Lopez-Perez, Mary
    Vallejo, Andres F.
    Amado-Garavito, Andres B.
    Cespedes, Nora
    Castellanos, Angelica
    Molina, Karen
    Trejos, Johanna
    Onate, Jose
    Epstein, Judith E.
    Richie, Thomas L.
    Herrera, Socrates
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2016, 10 (10):
  • [32] Reproductive health risks and y chromosome genomic instability in male staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory with chronic low-dose x-ray exposure
    Andreassi, M. G.
    Borghini, A.
    Vecoli, C.
    Piccaluga, E.
    Guagliumi, G.
    Del Greco, M.
    Picano, E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 935 - 935
  • [34] Forced air warming to maintain normoTHERMIa during SEDation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: protocol for the THERMISED pilot randomized controlled trial
    Conway, Aaron
    Duff, Jed
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (10) : 2547 - 2557
  • [35] A randomized controlled trial to assess operator radiation exposure from cardiac catheterization procedures using RAD BOARD® with standard pelvic shielding versus standard pelvic shielding alone
    Suryadevara, Ramya
    Brown, Eddie D.
    Green, Sandy M.
    Scott, Thomas D.
    Nordberg, Cara M.
    Blankenship, James C.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 95 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [36] The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device
    Makdissi, Jimmy
    Pawar, Ravikiran R.
    Johnson, Ben
    Chong, Bun S.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (03)
  • [37] Effectiveness of a Real-Time X-ray Dosimetry Monitor in Reducing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures: The ESPRESSO-Raysafe Randomized Trial
    Olschewski, Maximilian
    Ullrich, Helen
    Brandt, Moritz
    Steven, Sebastian
    Ahoopai, Majid
    Blessing, Recha
    Petrescu, Aniela
    Wenzel, Philip
    Munzel, Thomas
    Gori, Tommaso
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [38] Efficacy of Single Dose Oral Paracetamol in Reducing Pain During Examination for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kabatas, Emrah Utku
    Dursun, Arzu
    Beken, Serdar
    Dilli, Dilek
    Zenciroglu, Aysegul
    Okumus, Nurullah
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2016, 83 (01): : 22 - 26
  • [39] Efficacy of Single Dose Oral Paracetamol in Reducing Pain During Examination for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Emrah Utku Kabataş
    Arzu Dursun
    Serdar Beken
    Dilek Dilli
    Ayşegül Zenciroğlu
    Nurullah Okumuş
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2016, 83 : 22 - 26
  • [40] Effectiveness of additional X-ray protection devices in reducing scattered radiation in radial intervention: the ESPRESSO randomised trial
    Anadol, Remzi
    Brandt, Moritz
    Merz, Nico
    Knorr, Maike
    Ahoopai, Majid
    Geyer, Martin
    Krompiec, Damian
    Wenzel, Phillip
    Munzel, Thomas
    Gori, Tommaso
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2020, 16 (08) : 663 - +