Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
|
作者
McCutcheon, Keir [1 ,3 ]
Vanhaverbeke, Maarten [1 ]
Pauwels, Ruben [1 ]
Dabin, Jeremie [2 ]
Schoonjans, Werner [2 ]
Bennett, Johan [1 ,3 ]
Adriaenssens, Tom [1 ,3 ]
Dubois, Christophe [1 ,3 ]
Sinnaeve, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Desmet, Walter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, Res Dosimetr Applicat, Mol, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
cardiac catheterization; cardiologists; percutaneous coronary intervention; radiation; risk; PELVIC LEAD SHIELD; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; IONIZING-RADIATION; THREEFOLD DECREASE; DOUBLE-EXPOSURE; REDUCTION; ACCESS; DETERMINANTS; INSIGHTS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009627
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Interventional cardiologists are occupationally exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation. The MAVIG X-ray protective drape (MXPD) is a commercially available light weight, lead-free shield placed over the pelvic area of patients to minimize operator radiation dose. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the MXPD during routine cardiac catheterization, including percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing operator radiation dose during cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (n=632) with or without pelvic MXPD. We measured operator radiation dose at 4 sites: left eye, chest, left ring finger, and right ring finger. The primary outcomes were the difference in first operator radiation dose (mu Sv) and relative dose of the first operator (radiation dose normalized for dose area product) at the level of the chest in the 2 groups. Results: The use of the MXPD was associated with a 50% reduction in operator radiation dose (median dose 30.5 [interquartile range, 23.0-39.7] mu Sv in no drape group versus 15.3 [interquartile range, 11.1-20.0] mu Sv in the drape group; P<0.001) and a 57% reduction in relative operator dose (P<0.001). The largest absolute reduction in dose was observed at the left finger (median left finger dose for the no drape group was 104.9 [75.7-137.4] mu Sv versus 41.9 [32.6-70.6] mu Sv in the drape group; P<0.001). Conclusions: The pelvic MXPD significantly reduces first operator radiation dose during routine cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04285944.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] X-Ray Dose from Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: A Comparison of Materials and Methods for Measurement or Calculation
    Herron, Brent
    Strain, John
    Fagan, Thomas
    Wright, Linda
    Shockley, Heather
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1157 - 1161
  • [22] Radiation dose to the patient and operator from a peripheral dual X-ray absorptiometry system
    Patel, R
    Blake, GM
    Fogelman, I
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1999, 2 (04) : 397 - 401
  • [23] The utilisation of the cardiovascular automated radiation reduction X-ray system (CARS) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory aids in the reduction of the patient radiation dose
    Didier, Romain
    Magalhaes, Marco A.
    Koifman, Edward
    Leven, Florent
    Castellant, Philippe
    Boschat, Jacques
    Jobic, Yannic
    Kiramijyan, Sarkis
    Nicol, Pierre-Philippe
    Gilard, Martine
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 12 (08) : E948 - E956
  • [24] Radiation dose reduction with digital flat panel cardiac x-ray imaging
    Raman, SV
    Niklason, L
    Benali, K
    Bush, CA
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 71 - 71
  • [25] Radiation dose of cardiac IVR x-ray systems: a comparison of present and past
    Inaba, Yohei
    Chida, Koichi
    Kobayashi, Ryota
    Haga, Yoshihiro
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2015, 70 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [26] Evaluation of novel X-ray protective eyewear in reducing the eye dose to interventional radiology physicians
    Endo, Mime
    Haga, Yoshihiro
    Sota, Masahiro
    Tanaka, Akiko
    Otomo, Kazuki
    Murabayashi, Yuuki
    Abe, Mitsuya
    Kaga, Yuji
    Inaba, Yohei
    Suzuki, Msatoshi
    Meguro, Taiichiro
    Chida, Koichi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (03) : 414 - 419
  • [27] Assessing the Efficacy of RADPAD Protection Drape in Reducing Radiation Exposure to Operators in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis
    Bahar, Abdul Rasheed
    Khanal, Resha
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Goru, Rohit K.
    Shafiq, Aimen
    Haider, Mobeen Z.
    Basit, Salman Abdul
    Bahar, Yasemin
    Umer, Ahmed Muaaz
    Sattar, Yasar
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [28] X-ray Magnetic Resonance Fusion Modality May Reduce Radiation Exposure and Contrast Dose in Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization of Congenital Heart Disease
    Abu Hazeem, Anas A.
    Dori, Yoav
    Whitehead, Kevin K.
    Harris, Matthew A.
    Fogel, Mark A.
    Gillespie, Matthew J.
    Rome, Jonathan J.
    Glatz, Andrew C.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 84 (05) : 795 - 800
  • [29] Generative learning approach for radiation dose reduction in X-ray guided cardiac interventions
    Azizmohammadi, Fariba
    Castellanos, Inaki Navarro
    Miro, Joaquim
    Segars, Paul
    Samei, Ehsan
    Duong, Luc
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : 4071 - 4081
  • [30] Using of the X-Ray Screens During Fluorographic Screening and Their Influence to the Patient Radiation Dose Reducing
    Miroshnichenko, N.
    2014 IEEE 34TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY (ELNANO), 2014, : 303 - 305