New d-dimer threshold for Japanese patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Takahashi, Jin [1 ]
Shiga, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Fukuyama, Yuita [1 ]
Hoshina, Yuiko [3 ]
Homma, Yosuke [1 ]
Mizobe, Michiko [1 ]
Numata, Kenji [1 ]
Inoue, Tetsuya [1 ]
Funakoshi, Hiraku [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
[2] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Dept Emergency Med, Minato Ku, 1-4-3 Mita, Tokyo 1088329, Japan
[3] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Div Strateg Planning & Anal, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; New d-dimer threshold; Emergency department; Japan; Factor V Leiden; Prothrombin gene G20210A mutations; FACTOR-V-LEIDEN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; RULE-OUT CRITERIA; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12245-019-0242-y
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), the d-dimer threshold is based on studies conducted in Western countries, where the incidence rate is 5 times higher than that in Asian countries, including Japan. If we could elevate the d-dimer threshold based on the low pre-test probability in the Japanese population, we could omit the computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) which might lead to radiation exposure and contrast-induced nephropathy. Therefore, we aimed to determine a new d-dimer threshold specific to Japanese individuals.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at an emergency department in Japan, using medical charts collected from January 2013 to July 2017. We included patients whose d-dimer were measured for suspicion of PE with low or intermediate probability of PE and CTPA were performed. The primary outcome was failure rate of the new d-dimer threshold, defined as the rate of PE detected by CTPA among patients with d-dimer under the new threshold ranging from 1000 to 1500 mu g/L by 100. The new d-dimer threshold was appropriate if the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of the failure rate of PE was approximately 3%.ResultsIn 395 patients included, the number of patients with PE was 24 (the prevalence was 6.1%). If the d-dimer threshold was 1100 mu g/L, the failure rate was 0% (0/119), the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the failure rate was 3.1%, and 30% (119/395) of the CTPA might be omitted.ConclusionThe new d-dimer threshold could safely exclude PE. This result can be generalized to other Asian populations with a lower incidence of PE. Further prospective studies will be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of D-dimer ELISA test in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
    Tardy, B
    Tardy-Poncet, B
    Viallon, A
    Lafond, P
    Page, V
    Venet, C
    Bertrand, JC
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1998, 79 (01) : 38 - 41
  • [22] D-dimer in patients infected with COVID-19 and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Garcia-Olive, Ignasi
    Sintes, Helena
    Radua, Joaquim
    Abad Capa, Jorge
    Rosell, Antoni
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 169
  • [23] Clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
    Righini, M
    Le Gal, G
    De Lucia, S
    Roy, PM
    Meyer, G
    Aujesky, D
    Bounameaux, H
    Perrier, A
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2006, 95 (04) : 715 - 719
  • [24] D-dimer testing in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Kampolis, Christos F.
    Moschos, Charalampos
    Loukeri, Angeliki A.
    Spithakis, Panagiotis-Dimitrios
    Stratos, Eustratios
    Papapetrou, Dimosthenis
    Alexikou, Alexia
    Tzagkaraki, Aikaterini
    Kythreotis, Prokopis
    Veldekis, Dimitrios
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [25] D-dimer Testing in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Impaired Renal Function
    Karami-Djurabi, Reza
    Klok, Frederikus A.
    Kooiman, Judith
    Velthuis, Sophie I.
    Nijkeuter, Mathilde
    Huisman, Menno V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 122 (11): : 1050 - 1053
  • [26] Could D-dimer provide a definitive diagnosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism?
    Nadine S Gibson
    Harry R Büller
    Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2006, 3 : 654 - 655
  • [27] Unusefulness of D-Dimer ELISA tests in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
    Tardy, B
    TardyPoncet, B
    Viallon, A
    Lafond, P
    Page, Y
    Bertrand, JC
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1997, : PS167 - PS167
  • [28] Clinical usefulness of D-dimer in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    de Lucia, S
    Aujesky, D
    Comuz, J
    de Moerloose, P
    Roy, P
    Bounameaux, H
    Perrier, A
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 : 223 - 223
  • [29] The place of D-dimer testing in an integrated approach of patients suspected of pulmonary embolism
    de Moerloose, P
    Michiels, JJ
    Bounameaux, H
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1998, 24 (04): : 409 - 412
  • [30] D-dimer test for suspected pulmonary embolism in inpatients.
    Cocci, F
    Monti, S
    Bauleo, C
    Prediletto, R
    Pistolesi, M
    Marini, C
    Di Ricco, G
    Formichi, B
    Rizzello, L
    Tonelli, L
    Allescia, G
    Carrozzi, L
    Dainelli, A
    Miniati, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : A456 - A456