Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Different Corneal Thicknesses

被引:8
|
作者
Roszkowska, A. M. [1 ]
De Grazia, L. [1 ]
Cirone, M. [1 ]
Ferreri, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Ophthalmol Clin, Dept Surg Specialties, Messina, Italy
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Goldmann applanation tonometer; Dynamic contour tonometer; Corneal thickness; LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; HUMAN CADAVER EYES; GLAUCOMA; PATIENT; MYOPIA;
D O I
10.1159/000209253
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in the evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with different corneal thicknesses. Methods: GAT and DCT were performed in 70 eyes of 35 subjects aged between 21 and 59 years. Thirty eyes had normal, nonoperated corneas and 40 eyes had reduced central corneal thickness (CCT) following myopic photorefractive keratectomy. The GAT and DCT values were correlated to CCT and age and the agreement between both tonometers was determined by the Bland and Altman method. Results: GAT correlated strongly with CCT (p = 0.0002), but there was no correlation between DCT and CCT (p = 0.4388). No correlation was found between IOP values obtained with both devices and age. The Bland and Altman plot evidenced a lack of agreement between both tonometers with 95% limits of agreement between 1.6 and -5.6 mm Hg. Conclusions: GAT gives significantly lower values in the eyes with thin corneas and DCT is not influenced by CCT. DCT could be recommended to evaluate IOP in eyes with out-of-range corneal thickness. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 249
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Casaburi, Claudia
    De Pascale, Ilaria
    Capasso, Luigi
    Cione, Ferdinando
    Rosa, Nicola
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [32] Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations
    Maddalena De Bernardo
    Claudia Casaburi
    Ilaria De Pascale
    Luigi Capasso
    Ferdinando Cione
    Nicola Rosa
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [33] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects
    Medeiros, Felipe A.
    Sample, Pamela A.
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (04) : 658 - 665
  • [34] Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas
    Akkan, J. C. Umurhan
    Akkan, F.
    Akcay, B. I. Sezgin
    Ayintap, E.
    Tuncer, K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (10) : 1190 - 1197
  • [35] Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Wang, Jing
    Cayer, Marie-Michelle
    Descovich, Denise
    Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine
    Harasymowycz, Paul J.
    Li, Gisele
    Lesk, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (08) : 482 - 487
  • [36] Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Rosa, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2018, 11 (02) : 130 - 131
  • [37] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma
    Marcelo Lopes Silva Jordão
    Vital Paulino Costa
    Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues
    Jayter Silva Paula
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 117 - 121
  • [38] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 2022, 119 : S71 - S76
  • [39] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2022, 119 (SUPPL 1): : 71 - 76
  • [40] Repeatability and Reproducibility for Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Dynamic Contour, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Sullivan-Mee, Michael
    Gerhardt, Gretchen
    Halverson, Kathy D.
    Qualls, Clifford
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2009, 18 (09) : 666 - 673