Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Different Corneal Thicknesses

被引:8
|
作者
Roszkowska, A. M. [1 ]
De Grazia, L. [1 ]
Cirone, M. [1 ]
Ferreri, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Ophthalmol Clin, Dept Surg Specialties, Messina, Italy
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Goldmann applanation tonometer; Dynamic contour tonometer; Corneal thickness; LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; HUMAN CADAVER EYES; GLAUCOMA; PATIENT; MYOPIA;
D O I
10.1159/000209253
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in the evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with different corneal thicknesses. Methods: GAT and DCT were performed in 70 eyes of 35 subjects aged between 21 and 59 years. Thirty eyes had normal, nonoperated corneas and 40 eyes had reduced central corneal thickness (CCT) following myopic photorefractive keratectomy. The GAT and DCT values were correlated to CCT and age and the agreement between both tonometers was determined by the Bland and Altman method. Results: GAT correlated strongly with CCT (p = 0.0002), but there was no correlation between DCT and CCT (p = 0.4388). No correlation was found between IOP values obtained with both devices and age. The Bland and Altman plot evidenced a lack of agreement between both tonometers with 95% limits of agreement between 1.6 and -5.6 mm Hg. Conclusions: GAT gives significantly lower values in the eyes with thin corneas and DCT is not influenced by CCT. DCT could be recommended to evaluate IOP in eyes with out-of-range corneal thickness. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 249
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study
    Achiron, A.
    Blumenfeld, O.
    Avizemer, H.
    Karmona, L.
    Leybowich, G.
    Man, V.
    Bartov, E.
    Burgansky-Eliash, Z.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2016, 39 (10): : 822 - 828
  • [42] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma
    Silva Jordao, Marcelo Lopes
    Costa, Vital Paulino
    Veronese Rodrigues, Maria de Lourdes
    Paula, Jayter Silva
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (01) : 117 - 121
  • [43] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties
    Ceruti, Piero
    Morbio, Roberta
    Marraffa, Michele
    Marchini, Giorgio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 145 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [44] A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy
    Afshin Lotfi Sadigh
    Rohollah F. Fouladi
    Hassan Hashemi
    Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 603 - 608
  • [45] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Pache, M
    Wilmsmeyer, S
    Lautebach, S
    Funk, J
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (08) : 763 - 767
  • [46] Comparison of dynamic contour, rebound and standard Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, J
    Garcia-Feijoo, J
    Vico, E
    Fernandez-Vidal, A
    Castillo, A
    Mendez, C
    Pablo, L
    Garcia-Sanchez, J
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [47] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects
    Barleon, Lorenz
    Hoffmann, Esther M.
    Berres, Manfred
    Pfeiffer, Norbert
    Grus, Franz H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (04) : 583 - 590
  • [48] A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy
    Sadigh, Afshin Lotfi
    Fouladi, Rohollah F.
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Beheshtnejad, Amir Houshang
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (02) : 603 - 608
  • [49] Dynamic Contour Tonometry versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry after vitrectomy
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Fuest, Matthias
    Roeler, Gernot
    Mazinani, Babac
    Plange, Niklas
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [50] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Fuest, Matthias
    Koutsonas, Antonios
    Roessler, Gernot
    Mazinani, Babac E.
    Walter, Peter
    Plange, Niklas
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (08) : 663 - 668