Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Cayer, Marie-Michelle [2 ]
Descovich, Denise [1 ]
Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine [1 ,2 ]
Harasymowycz, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Gisele [1 ,2 ]
Lesk, Mark R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maisonneuve Rosemont Hosp, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
intraocular pressure; dynamic contour tonometry; axial length; corneal hysteresis; ocular pulse amplitude; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OCULAR PULSE AMPLITUDE; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RESPONSE ANALYZER; REFRACTIVE-ERROR; AXIAL LENGTH; HYSTERESIS; GLAUCOMA; MYOPIA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efbe8f
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine if the difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is correlated with axial length (AL), and to assess the possible influence of age, sex, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and glaucoma status on the difference in IOP measurements between the 2 instruments (Delta IOP=DCT(IOP)-GAT(IOP)). Methods: Two hundred sixty-oneparticipants (509 eyes) in these 4 groups were included: 53 normal individuals (N; 106 eyes), 112 glaucoma patients (OAG; 212 eyes), 52 glaucoma suspects (GS; 103 eyes), and 44 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT; 88 eyes). The patients who had had an incisional ocular surgery were excluded. All participants underwent IOP evaluation with DCT and GAT and AL, CCT, and CH measurements. The influence of age, sex, AL, CCT, CH, OPA, and glaucoma diagnostic status on Delta IOP was evaluated using correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Right (OD) and left eyes (OS) were analyzed separately. Results: Delta IOP was higher in eyes with longer axial lengths (OD: r = 0.142, P = 0.02; OS: r = 0.233, P < 0.001). Delta IOP also correlated with CH (OD: r = -0. 127, P = 0.04; OS: r = -0.169, P = 0.01), in which the Delta IOP increased as CH decreased (corresponding to less rigid corneas). OPA also correlated negatively with Delta IOP, but the correlation was only statistically significant in left eye (OD: r = -0.112, P = 0.08; OS: r = -0.124, P = 0.05). Age, CCT, sex, and diagnostic status did not influence Delta IOP significantly. Conclusions: GAT underestimated IOP more compared with DCT in patients with longer axial length and in patients with lower corneal hysteresis.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry: correlation with intracameral assessment of intraocular pressure
    Riva, Ivano
    Quaranta, Luciano
    Russo, Andrea
    Katsanos, Andreas
    Rulli, Eliana
    Floriani, Irene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [2] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement by Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    DeBry, PW
    Krishna, R
    Willoughby, TL
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U372 - U372
  • [3] Intraocular pressure measurement - Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Schneider, E
    Grehn, F
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [4] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    Hsu, S-Y
    Sheu, M-M
    Hsu, A-H
    Wu, K-Y
    Yeh, J-I
    Tien, J-N
    Tsai, R-K
    EYE, 2009, 23 (07) : 1582 - 1588
  • [5] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    S-Y Hsu
    M-M Sheu
    A-H Hsu
    K-Y Wu
    J-I Yeh
    J-N Tien
    R-K Tsai
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 1582 - 1588
  • [6] Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
    Shemesh, Gabi
    Soiberman, Uri
    Kurtz, Shimon
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 6 : 1967 - 1970
  • [7] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [8] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Ku, JYF
    Danesh-Meyer, HV
    Craig, JP
    Gamble, GD
    McGhee, CNJ
    EYE, 2006, 20 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [9] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Kaufmann, C
    Bachmann, LM
    Thiel, MA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (09) : 3118 - 3121
  • [10] Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas
    Akkan, J. C. Umurhan
    Akkan, F.
    Akcay, B. I. Sezgin
    Ayintap, E.
    Tuncer, K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (10) : 1190 - 1197