Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Cayer, Marie-Michelle [2 ]
Descovich, Denise [1 ]
Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine [1 ,2 ]
Harasymowycz, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Gisele [1 ,2 ]
Lesk, Mark R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maisonneuve Rosemont Hosp, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
intraocular pressure; dynamic contour tonometry; axial length; corneal hysteresis; ocular pulse amplitude; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OCULAR PULSE AMPLITUDE; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RESPONSE ANALYZER; REFRACTIVE-ERROR; AXIAL LENGTH; HYSTERESIS; GLAUCOMA; MYOPIA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efbe8f
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine if the difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is correlated with axial length (AL), and to assess the possible influence of age, sex, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and glaucoma status on the difference in IOP measurements between the 2 instruments (Delta IOP=DCT(IOP)-GAT(IOP)). Methods: Two hundred sixty-oneparticipants (509 eyes) in these 4 groups were included: 53 normal individuals (N; 106 eyes), 112 glaucoma patients (OAG; 212 eyes), 52 glaucoma suspects (GS; 103 eyes), and 44 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT; 88 eyes). The patients who had had an incisional ocular surgery were excluded. All participants underwent IOP evaluation with DCT and GAT and AL, CCT, and CH measurements. The influence of age, sex, AL, CCT, CH, OPA, and glaucoma diagnostic status on Delta IOP was evaluated using correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Right (OD) and left eyes (OS) were analyzed separately. Results: Delta IOP was higher in eyes with longer axial lengths (OD: r = 0.142, P = 0.02; OS: r = 0.233, P < 0.001). Delta IOP also correlated with CH (OD: r = -0. 127, P = 0.04; OS: r = -0.169, P = 0.01), in which the Delta IOP increased as CH decreased (corresponding to less rigid corneas). OPA also correlated negatively with Delta IOP, but the correlation was only statistically significant in left eye (OD: r = -0.112, P = 0.08; OS: r = -0.124, P = 0.05). Age, CCT, sex, and diagnostic status did not influence Delta IOP significantly. Conclusions: GAT underestimated IOP more compared with DCT in patients with longer axial length and in patients with lower corneal hysteresis.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy
    Afshin Lotfi Sadigh
    Rohollah F. Fouladi
    Hassan Hashemi
    Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 603 - 608
  • [32] Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals
    Kamel, Khalid
    Dervan, Edward
    Falzon, Kevin
    O'Brien, Colm
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (01) : 321 - 325
  • [33] Dynamic Contour Tonometry versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry after vitrectomy
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Fuest, Matthias
    Roeler, Gernot
    Mazinani, Babac
    Plange, Niklas
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [34] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Fuest, Matthias
    Koutsonas, Antonios
    Roessler, Gernot
    Mazinani, Babac E.
    Walter, Peter
    Plange, Niklas
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (08) : 663 - 668
  • [35] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Mona Pache
    Sonja Wilmsmeyer
    Sonja Lautebach
    Jens Funk
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2005, 243 : 763 - 767
  • [36] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice
    Halkiadakis, Ioannis
    Patsea, Eleni
    Chatzimichali, Katerina
    Skouriotis, Sotiris
    Chalkidou, Sonia
    Amariotakis, Georgios
    Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios
    Theodossiadis, George
    Amariotakis, Apostolos
    Georgopoulos, Gerasimos
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 87 (03) : 323 - 328
  • [37] A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy
    Sadigh, Afshin Lotfi
    Fouladi, Rohollah F.
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Beheshtnejad, Amir Houshang
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (02) : 603 - 608
  • [38] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tonopen XL, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Yildiz, Izlem
    Altan, Cigdem
    Cakmak, Semih
    Genc, Selim
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    Agca, Alper
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (11) : 909 - 914
  • [39] Clinical differences in rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements of intraocular pressure in adult patients
    Chiu, Zelia
    Collins, Camille
    van der Straaten, David
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 50 (08): : 923 - 924
  • [40] Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
    Ceruti, P.
    Morbio, R.
    Marraffa, M.
    Marchini, G.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (02) : 262 - 269