Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Cayer, Marie-Michelle [2 ]
Descovich, Denise [1 ]
Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine [1 ,2 ]
Harasymowycz, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Gisele [1 ,2 ]
Lesk, Mark R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maisonneuve Rosemont Hosp, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
intraocular pressure; dynamic contour tonometry; axial length; corneal hysteresis; ocular pulse amplitude; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OCULAR PULSE AMPLITUDE; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RESPONSE ANALYZER; REFRACTIVE-ERROR; AXIAL LENGTH; HYSTERESIS; GLAUCOMA; MYOPIA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efbe8f
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine if the difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is correlated with axial length (AL), and to assess the possible influence of age, sex, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and glaucoma status on the difference in IOP measurements between the 2 instruments (Delta IOP=DCT(IOP)-GAT(IOP)). Methods: Two hundred sixty-oneparticipants (509 eyes) in these 4 groups were included: 53 normal individuals (N; 106 eyes), 112 glaucoma patients (OAG; 212 eyes), 52 glaucoma suspects (GS; 103 eyes), and 44 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT; 88 eyes). The patients who had had an incisional ocular surgery were excluded. All participants underwent IOP evaluation with DCT and GAT and AL, CCT, and CH measurements. The influence of age, sex, AL, CCT, CH, OPA, and glaucoma diagnostic status on Delta IOP was evaluated using correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Right (OD) and left eyes (OS) were analyzed separately. Results: Delta IOP was higher in eyes with longer axial lengths (OD: r = 0.142, P = 0.02; OS: r = 0.233, P < 0.001). Delta IOP also correlated with CH (OD: r = -0. 127, P = 0.04; OS: r = -0.169, P = 0.01), in which the Delta IOP increased as CH decreased (corresponding to less rigid corneas). OPA also correlated negatively with Delta IOP, but the correlation was only statistically significant in left eye (OD: r = -0.112, P = 0.08; OS: r = -0.124, P = 0.05). Age, CCT, sex, and diagnostic status did not influence Delta IOP significantly. Conclusions: GAT underestimated IOP more compared with DCT in patients with longer axial length and in patients with lower corneal hysteresis.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals
    Ouyang, Ping-Bo
    Li, Cong-Yi
    Zhu, Xiao-Hua
    Duan, Xuan-Chu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 5 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [23] Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy
    Detorakis, Efstathios T.
    Grammenandi, Emilia
    Pallikaris, Ioannis G.
    Tsilimbaris, Miltiadis K.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 2010
  • [24] Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Different Corneal Thicknesses
    Roszkowska, A. M.
    De Grazia, L.
    Cirone, M.
    Ferreri, G.
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 223 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [25] Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Rosa, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2018, 11 (02) : 130 - 131
  • [26] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 2022, 119 : S71 - S76
  • [27] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2022, 119 (SUPPL 1): : 71 - 76
  • [28] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Pache, M
    Wilmsmeyer, S
    Lautebach, S
    Funk, J
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (08) : 763 - 767
  • [29] Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals
    Khalid Kamel
    Edward Dervan
    Kevin Falzon
    Colm O’Brien
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2019, 188 : 321 - 325
  • [30] A Clinical Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Yalcinbayir, Ozgur
    Baykara, Mehmet
    Atasoy, Aydin
    Ozcetin, Hikmet
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2010, 41 (04) : 437 - 442