Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

被引:40
|
作者
Layton, Alison [1 ]
Eady, E. Anne [1 ]
Peat, Maggie [1 ]
Whitehouse, Heather [2 ]
Levell, Nick [3 ]
Ridd, Matthew [4 ]
Cowdell, Fiona [5 ]
Patel, Mahenda [6 ]
Andrews, Stephen [7 ]
Oxnard, Christine [8 ]
Fenton, Mark [9 ]
Firkins, Lester [10 ]
机构
[1] Harrogate & Dist NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Dermatol, Harrogate, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Dermatol, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hull, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[6] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Pharm, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[7] British Lib, Sci Technol Med, London, England
[8] Yorkshire & Humber Clin Res Network, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Natl Inst Hlth & Care Excellence, UK Database Uncertainties Effects Treatment UK DU, London, England
[10] James Lind Alliance, NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
GLOBAL BURDEN; SKIN-DISEASE; VULGARIS; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS). Setting: The UK with international participation. Participants: Teenagers and adults with acne, parents, partners, nurses, clinicians, pharmacists, private practitioners. Methods: Treatment uncertainties were collected via separate online harvesting surveys, embedded within the PSP website, for patients and professionals. A wide variety of approaches were used to promote the surveys to stakeholder groups with a particular emphasis on teenagers and young adults. Survey submissions were collated using keywords and verified as uncertainties by appraising existing evidence. The 30 most popular themes were ranked via weighted scores from an online vote. At a priority setting workshop, patients and professionals discussed the 18 highest-scoring questions from the vote, and reached consensus on the top 10. Results: In the harvesting survey, 2310 people, including 652 professionals and 1456 patients (58% aged 24 y or younger), made submissions containing at least one research question. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 6255 questions were collated into themes. Valid votes ranking the 30 most common themes were obtained from 2807 participants. The top 10 uncertainties prioritised at the workshop were largely focused on management strategies, optimum use of common prescription medications and the role of non-drug based interventions. More female than male patients took part in the harvesting surveys and vote. A wider range of uncertainties were provided by patients compared to professionals. Conclusions: Engaging teenagers and young adults in priority setting is achievable using a variety of promotional methods. The top 10 uncertainties reveal an extensive knowledge gap about widely used interventions and the relative merits of drug versus non-drug based treatments in acne management.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Priorities for pulmonary hypertension research : A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Weatherald, Jason
    Iqbal, Hina
    Mielniczuk, Lisa
    Syed, Abdul Rehman
    Legkaia, Lena
    Howard, Jennifer
    Dempsey, Nicole
    Rader, Tamara
    Swiston, John
    Provencher, Steeve
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [12] Research priorities in pernicious anaemia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Staley, Kristina
    Ahmadi, Kourosh R.
    Carter, Karyl
    Cowan, Katherine
    Seage, Heidi
    Visser, Petra
    Ward, Nicola
    Hooper, Martyn
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [13] INSIGHT INTO THE RESULTS OF THE JAMES LIND ALLIANCE STROKE PRIORITY SETTING PARTNERSHIP PRIORITIES
    Hill, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2021, 16 (3_SUPPL) : 11 - 12
  • [14] Identifying the top research priorities in postmastectomy breast cancer reconstruction: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Zhong, Toni
    Mahajan, Anisha
    Cowan, Katherine
    Temple-Oberle, Claire
    Porter, Geoff
    LeBlanc, Martin
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [15] Identifying primary care patient safety research priorities in the UK: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Morris, Rebecca Lauren
    Stocks, Susan Jill
    Alam, Rahul
    Taylor, Sian
    Rolfe, Carly
    Glover, Steven William
    Whitcombe, Joanne
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [16] Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership
    Fackrell, Kathryn
    Stratmann, Linda
    Kennedy, Veronica
    MacDonald, Carol
    Hodgson, Hilary
    Wray, Nic
    Farrell, Carolyn
    Meadows, Mike
    Sheldrake, Jacqueline
    Byrom, Peter
    Baguley, David M.
    Kentish, Rosie
    Chapman, Sarah
    Marriage, Josephine
    Phillips, John
    Pollard, Tracey
    Henshaw, Helen
    Gronlund, Toto A.
    Hoare, Derek J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [17] Rare musculoskeletal diseases in adults: a research priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Gerda Mickute
    Kristina Staley
    Heather Delaney
    Oliver Gardiner
    Amy Hunter
    Richard Keen
    Lorraine Lockhart
    Nick Meade
    Maria Newman
    Stuart Ralston
    Elaine Rush
    Sheela Upadhyaya
    Sandra Regan
    Laura Watts
    Jennifer Walsh
    Paul White
    Roger M. Francis
    M. Kassim Javaid
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 15
  • [18] Research priorities in metastatic breast cancer: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Nixon, Nancy A.
    Simmons, Christine
    Lemieux, Julie
    Verma, Sunil
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (03): : 488 - 493
  • [19] Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study
    Jongsma K.
    van Seventer J.
    Verwoerd A.
    van Rensen A.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 6 (1)
  • [20] UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Hunter, Abby
    Ross, Louise
    Gronlund, Toto
    Cooper, Sue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (22) : 1 - 11