Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

被引:40
|
作者
Layton, Alison [1 ]
Eady, E. Anne [1 ]
Peat, Maggie [1 ]
Whitehouse, Heather [2 ]
Levell, Nick [3 ]
Ridd, Matthew [4 ]
Cowdell, Fiona [5 ]
Patel, Mahenda [6 ]
Andrews, Stephen [7 ]
Oxnard, Christine [8 ]
Fenton, Mark [9 ]
Firkins, Lester [10 ]
机构
[1] Harrogate & Dist NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Dermatol, Harrogate, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Dermatol, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hull, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[6] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Pharm, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[7] British Lib, Sci Technol Med, London, England
[8] Yorkshire & Humber Clin Res Network, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Natl Inst Hlth & Care Excellence, UK Database Uncertainties Effects Treatment UK DU, London, England
[10] James Lind Alliance, NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
GLOBAL BURDEN; SKIN-DISEASE; VULGARIS; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS). Setting: The UK with international participation. Participants: Teenagers and adults with acne, parents, partners, nurses, clinicians, pharmacists, private practitioners. Methods: Treatment uncertainties were collected via separate online harvesting surveys, embedded within the PSP website, for patients and professionals. A wide variety of approaches were used to promote the surveys to stakeholder groups with a particular emphasis on teenagers and young adults. Survey submissions were collated using keywords and verified as uncertainties by appraising existing evidence. The 30 most popular themes were ranked via weighted scores from an online vote. At a priority setting workshop, patients and professionals discussed the 18 highest-scoring questions from the vote, and reached consensus on the top 10. Results: In the harvesting survey, 2310 people, including 652 professionals and 1456 patients (58% aged 24 y or younger), made submissions containing at least one research question. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 6255 questions were collated into themes. Valid votes ranking the 30 most common themes were obtained from 2807 participants. The top 10 uncertainties prioritised at the workshop were largely focused on management strategies, optimum use of common prescription medications and the role of non-drug based interventions. More female than male patients took part in the harvesting surveys and vote. A wider range of uncertainties were provided by patients compared to professionals. Conclusions: Engaging teenagers and young adults in priority setting is achievable using a variety of promotional methods. The top 10 uncertainties reveal an extensive knowledge gap about widely used interventions and the relative merits of drug versus non-drug based treatments in acne management.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research priorities for children's cancer: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in the UK
    Aldiss, Susie
    Hollis, Rachel
    Phillips, Bob
    Ball-Gamble, Ashley
    Brownsdon, Alex
    Chisholm, Julia
    Crowther, Scott
    Dommett, Rachel
    Gower, Jonathan
    Hall, Nigel J.
    Hartley, Helen
    Hatton, Jenni
    Henry, Louise
    Langton, Loveday
    Maddock, Kirsty
    Malik, Sonia
    McEvoy, Keeley
    Morgan, Jessica Elizabeth
    Morris, Helen
    Parke, Simon
    Picton, Sue
    Reed-Berendt, Rosa
    Saunders, Dan
    Stewart, Andy
    Tarplee-Morris, Wendy
    Walsh, Amy
    Watkins, Anna
    Weller, David
    Gibson, Faith
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [32] Research priorities for young people with cancer: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Aldiss, Susie
    Fern, Lorna A.
    Phillips, Robert S.
    Callaghan, Amy
    Dyker, Karen
    Gravestock, Helen
    Groszmann, Michael
    Hamrang, Leila
    Hough, Rachael
    McGeachy, Demi
    Morgan, Sue
    Smith, Sam
    Upadhyaya, Sheela
    Veitch, Helen
    Veitch, Lara
    Williamson, Max
    Whelan, Jeremy S.
    Gibson, Faith
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [33] Research priorities for future pulmonary hypertension research: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Weatherald, J.
    Iqbal, H.
    Mielniczuk, L.
    Syed, A. R.
    Howard, J.
    Dempsey, N.
    Rader, T.
    Swiston, J.
    Provencher, S.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [34] The top 10 research priorities in bleeding disorders: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Shapiro, Susan
    Stephensen, David
    Camp, Charlotte
    Carroll, Liz
    Collins, Peter
    Elston, Derek
    Gallagher, Patrick
    Khair, Kate
    McKeown, William
    O'Hara, Jamie
    Stanworth, Simon
    Waterman, Amanda
    Woollard, Laurence
    Upadhyaya, Sheela
    Laffan, Michael
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2019, 186 (04) : E98 - E100
  • [35] Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Bretherton, Christopher Patrick
    Claireaux, Henry A.
    Gower, Jonathan
    Martin, Shan
    Thornhill, Angela
    Johnson, Louise
    Silvester, Lucy
    Kearney, Rebecca Samantha
    Baxter, Mark
    Dixon, Paul
    Giblin, Victoria
    Griffin, Xavier Luke
    Eardley, William
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [36] Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Bretherton, Christopher Patrick
    Hirst, Robert
    Gacaferi, Hamez
    Gower, Jonathan
    Exell, Lauren
    Johnston, Scott
    Martin, Shan
    Leech, Caroline
    Hilton, Catherine
    Battle, Ceri
    Axelrod, Daniel
    Vallier, Heather
    Van Embden, Daphne
    Stockton, David J.
    Cole, Elaine
    Williams, Julia
    Johnson, Louise
    Laubscher, Maritz
    Webb, Melissa
    Braude, Philip
    Norris, Sarah
    Bell, Steve
    Maqungo, Sithombo
    Griffin, Xavier Luke
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [37] Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: Reflections on the methodology used by the james lind alliance pressure ulcer priority setting partnership
    Madden M.
    Morley R.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 2 (1)
  • [38] THE UK JAMES LIND ALLIANCE STROKE PRIORITY SETTING PARTNERSHIP: AN INCLUSIVE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH PRIORITY RESEARCH AREAS
    Ahmed, R.
    Regan, S.
    Hill, G.
    Francis, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2021, 16 (2_SUPPL) : 129 - 129
  • [39] Future research priorities for lichen sclerosus - results of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Simpson, R. C.
    Cooper, S. M.
    Kirtschig, G.
    Larsen, S.
    Lawton, S.
    McPhee, M.
    Murphy, R.
    Nunns, D.
    Rees, S.
    Tarpey, M.
    Thomas, K. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 180 (05) : 1236 - 1237
  • [40] THE TOP 10 RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: A JAMES LIND ALLIANCE PRIORITY SETTING PARTNERSHIP
    Hailey, Louise
    Kinsella, Suzannah
    Bundy, Chris
    Burstow, Helen
    Chandler, David
    Cowper, Russ
    Helliwell, Philip
    Joannes, Lucille
    Kelly, Andy
    Kennedy, Bronagh
    McAteer, Helen
    Mukherjee, Sandeep
    Packham, Jon
    Wise, Elspeth
    Young, Helen
    Coates, Laura
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 61