Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

被引:40
|
作者
Layton, Alison [1 ]
Eady, E. Anne [1 ]
Peat, Maggie [1 ]
Whitehouse, Heather [2 ]
Levell, Nick [3 ]
Ridd, Matthew [4 ]
Cowdell, Fiona [5 ]
Patel, Mahenda [6 ]
Andrews, Stephen [7 ]
Oxnard, Christine [8 ]
Fenton, Mark [9 ]
Firkins, Lester [10 ]
机构
[1] Harrogate & Dist NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Dermatol, Harrogate, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Dermatol, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hull, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[6] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Pharm, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[7] British Lib, Sci Technol Med, London, England
[8] Yorkshire & Humber Clin Res Network, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Natl Inst Hlth & Care Excellence, UK Database Uncertainties Effects Treatment UK DU, London, England
[10] James Lind Alliance, NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
GLOBAL BURDEN; SKIN-DISEASE; VULGARIS; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS). Setting: The UK with international participation. Participants: Teenagers and adults with acne, parents, partners, nurses, clinicians, pharmacists, private practitioners. Methods: Treatment uncertainties were collected via separate online harvesting surveys, embedded within the PSP website, for patients and professionals. A wide variety of approaches were used to promote the surveys to stakeholder groups with a particular emphasis on teenagers and young adults. Survey submissions were collated using keywords and verified as uncertainties by appraising existing evidence. The 30 most popular themes were ranked via weighted scores from an online vote. At a priority setting workshop, patients and professionals discussed the 18 highest-scoring questions from the vote, and reached consensus on the top 10. Results: In the harvesting survey, 2310 people, including 652 professionals and 1456 patients (58% aged 24 y or younger), made submissions containing at least one research question. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 6255 questions were collated into themes. Valid votes ranking the 30 most common themes were obtained from 2807 participants. The top 10 uncertainties prioritised at the workshop were largely focused on management strategies, optimum use of common prescription medications and the role of non-drug based interventions. More female than male patients took part in the harvesting surveys and vote. A wider range of uncertainties were provided by patients compared to professionals. Conclusions: Engaging teenagers and young adults in priority setting is achievable using a variety of promotional methods. The top 10 uncertainties reveal an extensive knowledge gap about widely used interventions and the relative merits of drug versus non-drug based treatments in acne management.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rare musculoskeletal diseases in adults: a research priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Mickute, Gerda
    Staley, Kristina
    Delaney, Heather
    Gardiner, Oliver
    Hunter, Amy
    Keen, Richard
    Lockhart, Lorraine
    Meade, Nick
    Newman, Maria
    Ralston, Stuart
    Rush, Elaine
    Upadhyaya, Sheela
    Regan, Sandra
    Watts, Laura
    Walsh, Jennifer
    White, Paul
    Francis, Roger M.
    Javaid, M. Kassim
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [22] Research priorities in advanced heart failure: James Lind alliance priority setting partnership
    Taylor, Clare J.
    Huntley, Alyson L.
    Burden, John
    Gadoud, Amy
    Gronlund, Toto
    Jones, Nicholas Robert
    Wicks, Eleanor
    McKelvie, Sara
    Byatt, Kit
    Lehman, Richard
    King, Anna
    Mumford, Bev
    Feder, Gene
    Mant, Jonathan
    Hobbs, Richard
    Johnson, Rachel
    OPEN HEART, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [23] Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Ho, Alison
    Webster, Louise
    Bowen, Liza
    Creighton, Fiona
    Findlay, Sarah
    Gale, Chris
    Green, Marcus
    Gronlund, Toto
    Magee, Laura A.
    McManus, Richard J.
    Mistry, Hiten D.
    Singleton, Gemma
    Thornton, Jim
    Whybrow, Rebecca
    Chappell, Lucy
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07): : e036347
  • [24] Identifying the Top Ten Unanswered Questions in Community Nursing: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in Community Nursing
    Henshall, Catherine
    Jones, Louise
    Armitage, Claire
    Tomlinson, Lee
    ADVANCES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 2022
  • [25] Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Hollis, Chris
    Sampson, Stephanie
    Simons, Lucy
    Davies, E. Bethan
    Churchill, Rachel
    Betton, Victoria
    Butler, Debbie
    Chapman, Kathy
    Easton, Katherine
    Gronlund, Toto Anne
    Kabir, Thomas
    Rawsthorne, Mat
    Rye, Elizabeth
    Tomlin, Andre
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 5 (10): : 845 - 854
  • [26] Identifying the top research priorities in medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES): a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina Maria
    Sweetman, Jennifer
    Edwards, Mark
    Gall, Nicholas
    Gilligan, Jennifer
    Hayle, Stephanie
    Kaul, Arvind
    Moriarty, Andrew Stephen
    Perros, Petros
    Sampford, James
    Smith, Natalie
    Elfeddali, Iman
    Varley, Danielle
    Gower, Jonathan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [27] The top 10 research priorities in bleeding disorders: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Shapiro, S.
    Stephenson, D.
    Camp, C.
    Carroll, L.
    Collins, P.
    Elston, D.
    Gallagher, P.
    Khair, K.
    McKeown, W.
    O'Hara, J.
    Stanworth, S.
    Waterman, A.
    Woollard, L.
    Upadhyaya, S.
    Laffan, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2019, 185 : 131 - 131
  • [28] The top 10 research priorities in bleeding disorders: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Laffan, M.
    Stephensen, D.
    Camp, C.
    Carroll, L.
    Collins, P.
    Eleston, D.
    Gallagher, P.
    Khair, K.
    McKeown, W.
    O'Hara, J.
    Shapiro, S.
    Stanworth, S.
    Waterman, A.
    Woollard, L.
    Upadhyaya, S.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2019, 25 : 73 - 73
  • [29] The future of myeloma research in Canada and beyond: results of a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Fowler, Samantha
    McLaughlin, Lauren
    Bridges, Sarah
    Robichaud, Marc
    Ridgway, Barbara
    Reece, Donna
    Song, Kevin
    Dalrymple, Lorelei
    Sully, Robin
    Nason, Sharon
    Rowland, Suzanne
    MacDonald, Trish
    Paine, William
    Reiman, Anthony
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2022, 196 (05) : E52 - E54
  • [30] The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Hailey, Louise
    Bundy, Chris
    Burstow, Helen
    Chandler, David
    Cowper, Russ
    Helliwell, Philip
    Joannes, Lucille
    Kelly, Andy
    Kennedy, Bronagh
    Kinsella, Suzannah
    McAteer, Helen
    Mukherjee, Sandeep
    Packham, Jon
    Wise, Elspeth
    Young, Helen
    Coates, Laura C.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 62 (08) : 2716 - 2723