An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution

被引:14
|
作者
Araki, K [1 ]
Endo, A [1 ]
Okano, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Showa Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Radiol, Ohta Ku, Tokyo 1458515, Japan
关键词
digital radiography; dental; radiography; technology; radiologic;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600504
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the sensitometric properties and resolution of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems. Methods: Three CCD-based systems were evaluated, RVG-4 (Trophy Radiologic, Paris, France) CDR (Schick Technologies Inc, Long Island, NY, USA) and Dixel (Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a photostimulable phosphor system (Digora, Soredex-Orion, Helsinki, Finland). The sensitometric properties were determined by measuring the gray levels at increasing exposures without making ally gray-scale adjustments. MTF was measured using images of a 10 mu m width slit inclined to the long and short axes of the detectors. Results: The CCD-based systems showed a linear relationship between exposure and gray level although there were some differences in sensitivity. In RVG-4, the gray level saturated at a lower exposure. Digora showed a logarithmic relationship at uniform exposure. However, there was a linear relationship when it was exposed below the calibration dose. The MTF was highest with RVG-4 and the lowest with the Digora. Conclusions: Each system has its own specific properties; RVG-4 has the highest resolution with the narrowest latitude: whereas Digora has the wider latitude but the lowest resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems
    Doyle, P
    Finney, L
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 117 (1-3) : 313 - 317
  • [2] Development and evaluation of physical properties for digital intra-oral radiographic system
    Hong, S
    Kim, HJ
    Jung, HJ
    Kim, KD
    So, SG
    Kim, JH
    Yoo, HS
    2002 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 1357 - 1360
  • [3] An in vitro comparison of four intra-oral ceramic repair systems
    Blum, Igor R.
    Nikolinakos, Nikolaos
    Lynch, Christopher D.
    Wilson, Nairn H. F.
    Millar, Brian J.
    Jagger, Daryll C.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (11) : 906 - 912
  • [4] INTRA-ORAL RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS
    PATEL, JR
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1979, 48 (05): : 479 - 483
  • [5] Dynamic range required for intra-oral radiographic systems
    Nishikawa K.
    Kousuge Y.
    Mori T.
    Kuroyanagi K.
    Oral Radiology, 1999, 15 (2) : 111 - 116
  • [6] A Comparison of Full Arch Trueness and Precision of Nine Intra-Oral Digital Scanners and Four Lab Digital Scanners
    Nulty, Adam B.
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [7] Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: a comparison
    Kumbuloglu, O
    User, A
    Toksavul, S
    Vallittu, PK
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 61 (05) : 268 - 272
  • [8] Alternative X-ray filters for an intra-oral digital radiographic system
    Stecke, J.
    Cruz, A. D.
    Almeida, S. M.
    Boscolo, F. N.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (05) : 361 - 366
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF PANORAMIC AND INTRA-ORAL RADIOGRAPHIC SURVEYS IN EVALUATING A DENTAL CLINIC POPULATION
    MUHAMMED, AH
    MANSONHING, LR
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1982, 54 (01): : 108 - 117
  • [10] Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems
    Gotfredsen, E
    Wenzel, A
    Grondahl, HG
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (01) : 34 - 38