An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution

被引:14
|
作者
Araki, K [1 ]
Endo, A [1 ]
Okano, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Showa Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Radiol, Ohta Ku, Tokyo 1458515, Japan
关键词
digital radiography; dental; radiography; technology; radiologic;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600504
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the sensitometric properties and resolution of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems. Methods: Three CCD-based systems were evaluated, RVG-4 (Trophy Radiologic, Paris, France) CDR (Schick Technologies Inc, Long Island, NY, USA) and Dixel (Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a photostimulable phosphor system (Digora, Soredex-Orion, Helsinki, Finland). The sensitometric properties were determined by measuring the gray levels at increasing exposures without making ally gray-scale adjustments. MTF was measured using images of a 10 mu m width slit inclined to the long and short axes of the detectors. Results: The CCD-based systems showed a linear relationship between exposure and gray level although there were some differences in sensitivity. In RVG-4, the gray level saturated at a lower exposure. Digora showed a logarithmic relationship at uniform exposure. However, there was a linear relationship when it was exposed below the calibration dose. The MTF was highest with RVG-4 and the lowest with the Digora. Conclusions: Each system has its own specific properties; RVG-4 has the highest resolution with the narrowest latitude: whereas Digora has the wider latitude but the lowest resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of intra-oral and study cast measurements in the assessment of malocclusion
    Ovsenik, M
    Farcnik, FM
    Verdenik, I
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2004, 26 (03) : 273 - 277
  • [42] A Comparison of intra-oral digital imaging modalities: Charged Couple Device versus Storage Phosphor Plate
    Anas, A.
    Asaad, J. M.
    Tarboush, K. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES-IJHS, 2010, 4 (02): : 156 - 167
  • [43] Comparison of periodontal measurements on intra-oral and panoramic radiographs.
    Volchansky, A
    Cleaton-Jones, P
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 615 - 615
  • [44] CMOS Digital Intra-Oral Sensor for X-Ray Radiography
    Liu, Xinqiao
    Byczko, Andrew
    Choi, Marcus
    Chung, Lap
    Do, Hung
    Fowler, Boyd
    Ispasoiu, Radu
    Joshi, Kumar
    Miller, Todd
    Nagy, Alex
    Reaves, David
    Rodricks, Brian
    Teeter, Doug
    Wang, George
    Xiao, Feng
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 7961
  • [45] Perceived exposure latitude in film and digital intra-oral radiography.
    Mol, A
    Black, PM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 1012 - 1012
  • [46] Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography
    Borg, E
    Attaelmanan, A
    Gröndahl, HG
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (02) : 70 - 75
  • [47] Fast-dissolving intra-oral drug delivery systems
    Saigal, Nitin
    Baboota, Sanjula
    Ahuja, Alka
    Ali, Javed
    EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2008, 18 (07) : 769 - 781
  • [48] Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography
    Stamatakis, HC
    Welander, U
    McDavid, WD
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [49] INTRA-ORAL SURFACE-PROPERTIES INFLUENCING DENTAL ADHESION
    GLANTZ, PO
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 185 (MAR): : 110 - COLL
  • [50] The effect of color vision resolution on intra-oral shade-selection accuracy
    Liu, Xin
    Guo, Xinwei
    Zhang, Zhimin
    Wu, Huang
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhao, Hongyan
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (05) : 1659 - 1669