Predictive dose accumulation for HN adaptive radiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, Donghoon [1 ]
Zhang, Pengpeng [1 ]
Nadeem, Saad [1 ]
Alam, Sadegh [1 ]
Jiang, Jue [1 ]
Caringi, Amanda [1 ]
Allgood, Natasha [1 ]
Aristophanous, Michalis [1 ]
Mechalakos, James [1 ]
Hu, Yu-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2020年 / 65卷 / 23期
关键词
parotid gland; displacement field; adaptive radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; NECK-CANCER; PAROTID-GLANDS; HEAD; STRATEGIES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/abbdb8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
During radiation therapy (RT) of head and neck (HN) cancer, the shape and volume of the parotid glands (PG) may change significantly, resulting in clinically relevant deviations of delivered dose from the planning dose. Early and accurate longitudinal prediction of PG anatomical changes during the RT can be valuable to inform decisions on plan adaptation. We developed a deep neural network for longitudinal predictions using the displacement fields (DFs) between the planning computed tomography (pCT) and weekly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sixty-three HN patients treated with volumetric modulated arc were retrospectively studied. We calculated DFs between pCT and week 1-3 CBCT by B-spline and Demon deformable image registration (DIR). The resultant DFs were subsequently used as input to our novel network to predict the week 4 to 6 DFs for generating predicted weekly PG contours and weekly dose distributions. For evaluation, we measured dice similarity (DICE), and the uncertainty of accumulated dose. Moreover, we compared the detection accuracies of candidates for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) when the trigger criteria were mean dose difference more than 10%, 7.5%, and 5%, respectively. The DICE of ipsilateral/contralateral PG at week 4 to 6 using the prediction model trained with B-spline were 0.81 +/- 0.07/0.81 +/- 0.04 (week 4), 0.79 +/- 0.06/0.81 +/- 0.05 (week 5) and 0.78 +/- 0.06/0.82 +/- 0.02 (week 6). The DICE with the Demons model were 0.78 +/- 0.08/0.82 +/- 0.03 (week 4), 0.77 +/- 0.07/0.82 +/- 0.04 (week 5) and 0.75 +/- 0.07/0.82 +/- 0.02 (week 6). The dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis with the predicted accumulated dose showed the feasibility of predicting dose uncertainty due to the PG anatomical changes. The AUC of ART candidate detection with our predictive model was over 0.90. In conclusion, the proposed network was able to predict future anatomical changes and dose uncertainty of PGs with clinically acceptable accuracy, and hence can be readily integrated into the ART workflow.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTEGRATION OF SYSTEMIC THERAPIES IN HN RADIOTHERAPY
    Calais, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S184 - S184
  • [42] Comparison of different dose accumulation strategies to estimate organ doses after stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Sebastian Regnery
    Lukas Leiner
    Carolin Buchele
    Philipp Hoegen
    Elisabetta Sandrini
    Thomas Held
    Maximilian Deng
    Tanja Eichkorn
    Carolin Rippke
    C. Katharina Renkamp
    Laila König
    Kristin Lang
    Sebastian Adeberg
    Jürgen Debus
    Sebastian Klüter
    Juliane Hörner-Rieber
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [43] Daily Adaptive Replanning with Dose Accumulation for Prostate Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Using Machine Learning Automated Planning On CBCT
    Golshan, M.
    Khalifa, A.
    Winter, J.
    Xie, J.
    McIntosh, C.
    Purdie, T.
    Malkov, V.
    Tadic, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E465 - E466
  • [44] Comparison of different dose accumulation strategies to estimate organ doses after stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Regnery, Sebastian
    Leiner, Lukas
    Buchele, Carolin
    Hoegen, Philipp
    Sandrini, Elisabetta
    Held, Thomas
    Deng, Maximilian
    Eichkorn, Tanja
    Rippke, Carolin
    Renkamp, C. Katharina
    Koenig, Laila
    Lang, Kristin
    Adeberg, Sebastian
    Debus, Juergen
    Klueter, Sebastian
    Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [45] On the Utilization of a Pseudo-Inverse Consistency Metric to Evaluate Deformable Dose Accumulation Error for MRI-Guide Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Zhong, H.
    Garcia-Alvarez, J.
    Kainz, K.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E281 - E281
  • [46] Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery vs Fractionated Radiotherapy for HN Paragangliomas
    Giannini, Laura
    Spina, Alfio
    Torrisi, Miriam
    Lucrezia, Denatoni Chiara
    Andrei, Fodor
    Boari, Nicola
    Perna, Lucia
    Gigliotti, Carmen
    Bailo, Michele
    Midulla, Martina
    Tummineri, Roberta
    Gagliardi, Filippo
    Dell'Oca, Italo
    Del Vecchio, Antonella
    Arcangeli, Stefano
    Mortini, Pietro
    Di Muzio, Nadia
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S1347 - S1348
  • [47] Dose Accumulation-Based Predictive Modeling for An Adaptive Replanning Physician Decision Support Tool for Stage III Lung Cancer
    Bollinger, D.
    Kavanaugh, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E670 - E671
  • [48] Comparison of different strategies for deformable dose accumulation in prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Murr, M.
    Wegener, D.
    Nachbar, M.
    Mueller, A.
    Zips, D.
    Thorwarth, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1511 - S1512
  • [49] An uncertainty metric to evaluate deformation vector fields for dose accumulation in radiotherapy
    Takemura, Akihiro
    Nagano, Akira
    Kojima, Hironori
    Ikeda, Tomohiro
    Yokoyama, Noriomi
    Tsukamoto, Kosuke
    Noto, Kimiya
    Isomura, Naoki
    Ueda, Shinichi
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 6 : 77 - 82
  • [50] Validity of dose shift-deformation invariance assumption for dose accumulation in head & neck radiotherapy
    Van Kranen, S.
    Wolf, A.
    Van Beek, S.
    Hamming-Vrieze, O.
    Van Herk, M.
    Sonke, J. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S95 - S96