Predictive dose accumulation for HN adaptive radiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, Donghoon [1 ]
Zhang, Pengpeng [1 ]
Nadeem, Saad [1 ]
Alam, Sadegh [1 ]
Jiang, Jue [1 ]
Caringi, Amanda [1 ]
Allgood, Natasha [1 ]
Aristophanous, Michalis [1 ]
Mechalakos, James [1 ]
Hu, Yu-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2020年 / 65卷 / 23期
关键词
parotid gland; displacement field; adaptive radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; NECK-CANCER; PAROTID-GLANDS; HEAD; STRATEGIES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/abbdb8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
During radiation therapy (RT) of head and neck (HN) cancer, the shape and volume of the parotid glands (PG) may change significantly, resulting in clinically relevant deviations of delivered dose from the planning dose. Early and accurate longitudinal prediction of PG anatomical changes during the RT can be valuable to inform decisions on plan adaptation. We developed a deep neural network for longitudinal predictions using the displacement fields (DFs) between the planning computed tomography (pCT) and weekly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sixty-three HN patients treated with volumetric modulated arc were retrospectively studied. We calculated DFs between pCT and week 1-3 CBCT by B-spline and Demon deformable image registration (DIR). The resultant DFs were subsequently used as input to our novel network to predict the week 4 to 6 DFs for generating predicted weekly PG contours and weekly dose distributions. For evaluation, we measured dice similarity (DICE), and the uncertainty of accumulated dose. Moreover, we compared the detection accuracies of candidates for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) when the trigger criteria were mean dose difference more than 10%, 7.5%, and 5%, respectively. The DICE of ipsilateral/contralateral PG at week 4 to 6 using the prediction model trained with B-spline were 0.81 +/- 0.07/0.81 +/- 0.04 (week 4), 0.79 +/- 0.06/0.81 +/- 0.05 (week 5) and 0.78 +/- 0.06/0.82 +/- 0.02 (week 6). The DICE with the Demons model were 0.78 +/- 0.08/0.82 +/- 0.03 (week 4), 0.77 +/- 0.07/0.82 +/- 0.04 (week 5) and 0.75 +/- 0.07/0.82 +/- 0.02 (week 6). The dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis with the predicted accumulated dose showed the feasibility of predicting dose uncertainty due to the PG anatomical changes. The AUC of ART candidate detection with our predictive model was over 0.90. In conclusion, the proposed network was able to predict future anatomical changes and dose uncertainty of PGs with clinically acceptable accuracy, and hence can be readily integrated into the ART workflow.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a Quality Assurance Process for Dose Accumulation in a CT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy System
    Maraghechi, B.
    Lam, D.
    Mazur, T.
    Hugo, G.
    Cai, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [22] An energy-conserving dose summation method for dose accumulation in radiotherapy
    Zhong, Hualiang
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 52 (02) : 1305 - 1310
  • [23] What Is the Importance of Dose Recalculation for Adaptive Radiotherapy Dose Assessment?
    Pukala, J.
    Staton, R.
    Langen, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3699 - 3699
  • [24] Image, dose and anatomy processing for adaptive radiotherapy
    Kessler, M
    Keranen, W
    Roberson, M
    McShan, D
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S58 - S58
  • [25] Dose adjustment and adaptive radiotherapy on the basis of IGRT
    Lohr, F.
    Boda-Heggemann, J.
    Walter, C.
    Wertz, H.
    Steil, V.
    Frederik, W.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2006, 182 : 150 - 150
  • [26] Development of a multi-layer quality assurance program to evaluate the uncertainty of deformable dose accumulation in adaptive radiotherapy
    Zhong, Hualiang
    Garcia-Alvarez, Juan A.
    Kainz, Kristofer
    Tai, An
    Ahunbay, Ergun
    Erickson, Beth
    Schultz, Christopher J.
    Li, X. Allen
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1766 - 1778
  • [27] Adaptive plan selection vs. re-optimisation in radiotherapy for bladder cancer: A dose accumulation comparison
    Vestergaard, Anne
    Muren, Ludvig Paul
    Sondergaard, Jimmi
    Elstrom, Ulrik Vindelev
    Hoyer, Morten
    Petersen, Jorgen B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 109 (03) : 457 - 462
  • [28] Deformable Dose Accumulation and Toxicity Analysis in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Rezaeian, N. Hassan
    Gui, C.
    Bosma, L.
    Sudharsan, M.
    Burleson, S.
    Cote, N.
    Brennan, V. S.
    Tyagi, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : E136 - E136
  • [29] Bladder and rectal dose accumulation for prostate radiotherapy agrees with planned dose goals
    Lipman, Djoeri
    Leijstra, Tommi S.
    Van Garderen, Thirza E.
    Docter, Rosalie R.
    Westendorp, Rik
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S5904 - S5907
  • [30] Evaluation of Repeated Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using a Radiotherapy Dose Accumulation Routine
    Hong, J.
    Yorke, E. D.
    Kuo, L.
    Hu, Y. C.
    Li, X.
    Wu, A. J.
    Liu, Y.
    Mechalakos, J. G.
    Zhang, P.
    Cervino, L. I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E573 - E573