Predictive dose accumulation for HN adaptive radiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, Donghoon [1 ]
Zhang, Pengpeng [1 ]
Nadeem, Saad [1 ]
Alam, Sadegh [1 ]
Jiang, Jue [1 ]
Caringi, Amanda [1 ]
Allgood, Natasha [1 ]
Aristophanous, Michalis [1 ]
Mechalakos, James [1 ]
Hu, Yu-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2020年 / 65卷 / 23期
关键词
parotid gland; displacement field; adaptive radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; NECK-CANCER; PAROTID-GLANDS; HEAD; STRATEGIES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/abbdb8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
During radiation therapy (RT) of head and neck (HN) cancer, the shape and volume of the parotid glands (PG) may change significantly, resulting in clinically relevant deviations of delivered dose from the planning dose. Early and accurate longitudinal prediction of PG anatomical changes during the RT can be valuable to inform decisions on plan adaptation. We developed a deep neural network for longitudinal predictions using the displacement fields (DFs) between the planning computed tomography (pCT) and weekly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sixty-three HN patients treated with volumetric modulated arc were retrospectively studied. We calculated DFs between pCT and week 1-3 CBCT by B-spline and Demon deformable image registration (DIR). The resultant DFs were subsequently used as input to our novel network to predict the week 4 to 6 DFs for generating predicted weekly PG contours and weekly dose distributions. For evaluation, we measured dice similarity (DICE), and the uncertainty of accumulated dose. Moreover, we compared the detection accuracies of candidates for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) when the trigger criteria were mean dose difference more than 10%, 7.5%, and 5%, respectively. The DICE of ipsilateral/contralateral PG at week 4 to 6 using the prediction model trained with B-spline were 0.81 +/- 0.07/0.81 +/- 0.04 (week 4), 0.79 +/- 0.06/0.81 +/- 0.05 (week 5) and 0.78 +/- 0.06/0.82 +/- 0.02 (week 6). The DICE with the Demons model were 0.78 +/- 0.08/0.82 +/- 0.03 (week 4), 0.77 +/- 0.07/0.82 +/- 0.04 (week 5) and 0.75 +/- 0.07/0.82 +/- 0.02 (week 6). The dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis with the predicted accumulated dose showed the feasibility of predicting dose uncertainty due to the PG anatomical changes. The AUC of ART candidate detection with our predictive model was over 0.90. In conclusion, the proposed network was able to predict future anatomical changes and dose uncertainty of PGs with clinically acceptable accuracy, and hence can be readily integrated into the ART workflow.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep learning based uncertainty prediction of deformable image registration for contour propagation and dose accumulation in online adaptive radiotherapy
    Smolders, A.
    Lomax, A.
    Weber, D. C.
    Albertini, F.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (24):
  • [32] Dose accumulation for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy: From practical considerations to state-of-the-art clinical implementation
    McDonald, Brigid A.
    Zachiu, Cornel
    Christodouleas, John
    Naser, Mohamed A.
    Ruschin, Mark
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Letourneau, Daniel
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Tadic, Tony
    Yang, Jinzhong
    Li, X. Allen
    Bernchou, Uffe
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    Bubula-Rehm, Edyta
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Brock, Kristy K.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12
  • [33] A multi-institutional comparison of retrospective deformable dose accumulation for online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy
    Murr, Martina
    Bernchou, Uffe
    Bubula-Rehm, Edyta
    Ruschin, Mark
    Sadeghi, Parisa
    Voet, Peter
    Winter, Jeff D.
    Yang, Jinzhong
    Younus, Eyesha
    Zachiu, Cornel
    Zhao, Yao
    Zhong, Hualiang
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 30
  • [34] Evaluation of nonrigid registration models for interfraction dose accumulation in radiotherapy
    Janssens, Guillaume
    de Xivry, Jonathan Orban
    Fekkes, Stein
    Dekker, Andre
    Macq, Benoit
    Lambin, Philippe
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) : 4268 - 4276
  • [35] A generalization of adaptive radiotherapy and the registration of deformable dose distributions
    Lu, WG
    Mackie, TR
    Keller, H
    Ruchala, KJ
    Olivera, GH
    USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 2000, : 521 - 523
  • [36] Single patient learning for adaptive radiotherapy dose prediction
    Maniscalco, Austen
    Liang, Xiao
    Lin, Mu-Han
    Jiang, Steve
    Nguyen, Dan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (12) : 7324 - 7337
  • [37] A method for predictive modeling of tumor regression for lung adaptive radiotherapy
    Kavanaugh, James
    Roach, Michael
    Ji, Zhen
    Fontenot, Jonas
    Hugo, Geoffrey D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (05) : 2083 - 2094
  • [38] Predictive tracking - For respiratory induced motion compensation in adaptive radiotherapy
    Skworcow, Piotr
    Putra, Devi
    Sahih, Abedelhamid
    Goodband, John
    Haas, Olivier C. L.
    Burnham, Keith J.
    Mills, John A.
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2007, 40 (01): : 16 - 19
  • [39] Dose guided adaptive radiotherapy based on cumulated dose in OAR for prostate cancer
    Nassef, M.
    Simon, A.
    Rigaud, B.
    Duverge, L.
    Lafond, C.
    Giraud, J. Y.
    Haigron, P.
    De Crevoisier, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S561 - S562
  • [40] Automated Dose Accumulation and Dose Accuracy Assessment for Online Or Offline Adaptive Replanning
    Chen, G.
    Ahunbay, E.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3786 - 3786