Everolimus in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Raphael, Jacques [1 ]
Lefebvre, Cory [2 ]
Allan, Alison [2 ]
Helou, Joelle [3 ]
Boldt, Gabriel [1 ]
Vandenberg, Theodore [1 ]
Blanchette, Phillip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Oncol, Div Med Oncol, London Reg Canc Program, 800 Commissioners Rd East, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PHASE-II TRIAL; PLUS EXEMESTANE; PI3K/AKT/MTOR PATHWAY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMBINATION; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PROGRESSION; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11523-020-00770-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Everolimus plus exemestane is approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The role of everolimus is less well defined in other breast cancer phenotypes and in combination with other drugs. Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to standard of care (SoC) in MBC regardless of tumor phenotype and treatment type. Methods The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible randomized trials. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and pooled risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios for objective response rates, disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher toxicity were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses compared survival outcomes by tumor phenotype. Results Data from 2826 patients from eight trials were analyzed. The addition of everolimus to SoC reduced the risk of disease progression by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.90). This did not translate into an OS benefit (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80-1.13). In addition, everolimus improved the DCR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98), whereas it increased the risk of developing grade 3 or higher toxicity. The PFS benefit was more prominent for patients with hormone receptor-positive (+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (-) disease. For the HER2 (+) subgroup, the PFS benefit was restricted to patients with hormone receptor (-) disease. Conclusions Everolimus reduces the risk of disease progression in hormone receptor (+) MBC. In patients with HER2 (+) disease, the benefit is limited for those with hormone receptor (-) disease. Given the approval and use of newer drugs in MBC, clinical trials and real-world data are needed to confirm the benefit of everolimus and define the best treatment sequence strategy to adopt in that setting.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gut microbiota and breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gamba, Guilherme
    Colonetti, Tamy
    Uggioni, Maria Laura Rodrigues
    Elibio, Laura Uggioni
    Balbinot, Eduarda Leticia
    Heinzen, Rebeca
    Macedo, Ana Cristina Lacerda
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    BREAST CANCER, 2025, 32 (02) : 242 - 257
  • [42] Vitamin A and Breast Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    He, Juanjuan
    Gu, Yuanting
    Zhang, Shaojin
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (06) : E1389 - E1400
  • [43] Rash to the mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramirez-Fort, Marigdalia K.
    Case, Emily C.
    Rosen, Alyx C.
    Cerci, Felipe B.
    Wu, Shenhong
    Lacouture, Mario E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (03): : 266 - 271
  • [44] Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bodewes, F. T. H.
    van Asselt, A. A.
    Dorrius, M. D.
    Greuter, M. J. W.
    de Bock, G. H.
    BREAST, 2022, 66 : 62 - 68
  • [45] Systematic review and meta-analysis on targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ciliberto, Domenico
    Staropoli, Nicoletta
    Chiellino, Silvia
    Botta, Cirino
    Tassone, Pierfrancesco
    Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2016, 16 (02) : 249 - 258
  • [46] Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7260): : 531 - 535
  • [47] Chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azizi, Alexander A.
    Lamarca, Angela
    McNamara, Mairead G.
    Valle, Juan W.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 163
  • [48] Significance of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Naqi, Asma
    Khan, Mohammad Ahmed
    Najmi, Abul Kalam
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 27 (03): : 950 - 959
  • [49] Advanced-stage breast cancer diagnosis and its determinants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zewdie, Amare
    Kassie, Tadele Derbew
    Anagaw, Tadele Fentabel
    Mazengia, Elyas Melaku
    Gelaw, Sintayehu Shiferaw
    Fenta, Eneyew Talie
    Eshetu, Habitu Birhan
    Kebede, Natnael
    Bogale, Eyob Ketema
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [50] The Association Between Meningioma and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Degeneffe, Aurelie
    De Maertelaer, Viviane
    De Witte, Olivier
    Lefranc, Florence
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (06) : E2318620