Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:62
|
作者
Bodewes, F. T. H. [1 ]
van Asselt, A. A. [1 ]
Dorrius, M. D. [2 ]
Greuter, M. J. W. [2 ]
de Bock, G. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen UMCG, Dept Epidemiol, Hanzepl 1, HPC FA40, POB 30-001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen UMCG, Dept Radiol, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BREAST | 2022年 / 66卷
关键词
Breast cancer risk; Breast cancer; Breast density; Mammographic density; BI-RADS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FILM-SCREEN; MORTALITY; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Mammographic density is a well-defined risk factor for breast cancer and having extremely dense breast tissue is associated with a one-to six-fold increased risk of breast cancer. However, it is questioned whether this increased risk estimate is applicable to current breast density classification methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further investigate and clarify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk based on current literature.Methods: Medline, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published since 2013, that used BI-RADS lexicon 5th edition and incorporated data on digital mammography. Crude and maximally confounder-adjusted data were pooled in odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects models. Heterogeneity regarding breast cancer risks were investigated using I2 statistic, stratified and sensitivity analyses.Results: Nine observational studies were included. Having extremely dense breast tissue (BI-RADS density D) resulted in a 2.11-fold (95% CI 1.84-2.42) increased breast cancer risk compared to having scattered dense breast tissue (BI-RADS density B). Sensitivity analysis showed that when only using data that had adjusted for age and BMI, the breast cancer risk was 1.83-fold (95% CI 1.52-2.21) increased. Both results were statistically significant and homogenous.Conclusions: Mammographic breast density BI-RADS D is associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of breast cancer compared to having BI-RADS density B in general population women. This is a novel and lower risk estimate compared to previously reported and might be explained due to the use of digital mammography and BI-RADS lexicon 5th edition.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammographic density and breast cancer risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thakrar, Dixa
    Grenville, Zoe
    Desai, Trishna
    Gathani, Toral
    Reeves, Gillian K.
    Barnes, Isobel
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [2] Mammographic Density Changes over Time and Breast Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mokhtary, Arezo
    Karakatsanis, Andreas
    Valachis, Antonis
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [3] Mammographic Density Phenotypes and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Pettersson, Andreas
    Graff, Rebecca E.
    Ursin, Giske
    Silva, Isabel dos Santos
    McCormack, Valerie
    Baglietto, Laura
    Vachon, Celine
    Bakker, Marije F.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Chia, Kee Seng
    Czene, Kamila
    Eriksson, Louise
    Hall, Per
    Hartman, Mikael
    Warren, Ruth M. L.
    Hislop, Greg
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Hopper, John L.
    Krishnan, Kavitha
    Li, Jingmei
    Li, Qing
    Pagano, Ian
    Rosner, Bernard A.
    Wong, Chia Siong
    Scott, Christopher
    Stone, Jennifer
    Maskarinec, Gertraud
    Boyd, Norman F.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (05)
  • [4] The association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bai S.
    Song D.
    Chen M.
    Lai X.
    Xu J.
    Dong F.
    [J]. BMC Women's Health, 24 (1)
  • [5] The association between mammographic density and breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bai, S.
    Song, D.
    Chen, M.
    Lai, X.
    Xu, J.
    Dong, F.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 78 (08) : 622 - 632
  • [6] Migraine and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Peng, Cheng
    Wu, Kongyuan
    Chen, Xiwen
    Lang, Hui
    Li, Changling
    He, Li
    Chen, Ning
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (03) : E122 - E130
  • [7] Risk Factors of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat
    Wiratkapun, Cholatip
    Lerdsitthichai, Panuwat
    Kasamesup, Vijj
    Wongwaisayawan, Sansanee
    Srinakarin, Jiraporn
    Hirunpat, Siriporn
    Woodtichartpreecha, Piyanoot
    Boonlikit, Sarawan
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 25 (05) : 368 - 387
  • [8] Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hedong Han
    Wei Guo
    Wentao Shi
    Yamei Yu
    Yunshuo Zhang
    Xiaofei Ye
    Jia He
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [9] Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Hedong
    Guo, Wei
    Shi, Wentao
    Yu, Yamei
    Zhang, Yunshuo
    Ye, Xiaofei
    He, Jia
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [10] Are mammographic density phenotypes associated with breast cancer treatment response and clinical outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kanbayti, Ibrahem H.
    Rae, William I. D.
    McEntee, Mark E.
    Ekpo, Ernest U.
    [J]. BREAST, 2019, 47 : 62 - 76