Everolimus in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Raphael, Jacques [1 ]
Lefebvre, Cory [2 ]
Allan, Alison [2 ]
Helou, Joelle [3 ]
Boldt, Gabriel [1 ]
Vandenberg, Theodore [1 ]
Blanchette, Phillip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Oncol, Div Med Oncol, London Reg Canc Program, 800 Commissioners Rd East, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PHASE-II TRIAL; PLUS EXEMESTANE; PI3K/AKT/MTOR PATHWAY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMBINATION; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PROGRESSION; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11523-020-00770-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Everolimus plus exemestane is approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The role of everolimus is less well defined in other breast cancer phenotypes and in combination with other drugs. Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to standard of care (SoC) in MBC regardless of tumor phenotype and treatment type. Methods The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible randomized trials. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and pooled risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios for objective response rates, disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher toxicity were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses compared survival outcomes by tumor phenotype. Results Data from 2826 patients from eight trials were analyzed. The addition of everolimus to SoC reduced the risk of disease progression by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.90). This did not translate into an OS benefit (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80-1.13). In addition, everolimus improved the DCR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98), whereas it increased the risk of developing grade 3 or higher toxicity. The PFS benefit was more prominent for patients with hormone receptor-positive (+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (-) disease. For the HER2 (+) subgroup, the PFS benefit was restricted to patients with hormone receptor (-) disease. Conclusions Everolimus reduces the risk of disease progression in hormone receptor (+) MBC. In patients with HER2 (+) disease, the benefit is limited for those with hormone receptor (-) disease. Given the approval and use of newer drugs in MBC, clinical trials and real-world data are needed to confirm the benefit of everolimus and define the best treatment sequence strategy to adopt in that setting.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Migraine and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Peng, Cheng
    Wu, Kongyuan
    Chen, Xiwen
    Lang, Hui
    Li, Changling
    He, Li
    Chen, Ning
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (03) : E122 - E130
  • [22] Risk Factors of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat
    Wiratkapun, Cholatip
    Lerdsitthichai, Panuwat
    Kasamesup, Vijj
    Wongwaisayawan, Sansanee
    Srinakarin, Jiraporn
    Hirunpat, Siriporn
    Woodtichartpreecha, Piyanoot
    Boonlikit, Sarawan
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 25 (05) : 368 - 387
  • [23] Polyomaviruses and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mousavi, Tahoora
    Shokoohy, Fatemeh
    Moosazadeh, Mahmood
    INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [24] Resistin and omentin in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zoroddu, Stefano
    Di Lorenzo, Biagio
    Paliogiannis, Panagiotis
    Mangoni, Arduino A.
    Carru, Ciriaco
    Zinellu, Angelo
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 562
  • [25] Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hedong Han
    Wei Guo
    Wentao Shi
    Yamei Yu
    Yunshuo Zhang
    Xiaofei Ye
    Jia He
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [26] Copper Concentrations in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jouybari, Leila
    Kiani, Faezeh
    Islami, Farhad
    Sanagoo, Akram
    Sayehmiri, Fatemeh
    Hosnedlova, Bozena
    Dosa, Monica Daniela
    Kizek, Rene
    Chirumbolo, Salvatore
    Bjorklund, Geir
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 27 (37) : 6373 - 6383
  • [27] Pilates for women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinto-Carral, Arrate
    Molina, Antonio J.
    de Pedro, Alvaro
    Ayan, Carlos
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2018, 41 : 130 - 140
  • [28] Breast cancer and organ transplantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lapointe, M.
    Kerbaul, F.
    Meckert, F.
    Cognard, N.
    Mathelin, C.
    Lodi, M.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2023, 51 (01): : 60 - 72
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis of cyclodiene insecticides and breast cancer
    Khanjani, Narges
    Hoving, Jan Lucas
    Forbes, Andrew Benjamin
    Sim, Malcolm Ross
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART C-ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS, 2007, 25 (01): : 23 - 52
  • [30] Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Blondeaux, Eva
    Bruzzone, Marco
    Perachino, Marta
    Anderson, Richard A.
    de Azambuja, Evandro
    Poorvu, Philip D.
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia
    Pistilli, Barbara
    Vaz-Luis, Ines
    Saura, Cristina
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Franzoi, Maria Alice
    Sertoli, Chiara
    Ceppi, Marcello
    Azim, Hatem A.
    Amant, Frederic
    Demeestere, Isabelle
    Del Mastro, Lucia
    Partridge, Ann H.
    Pagani, Olivia
    Peccatori, Fedro A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (29) : 3293 - +