Everolimus in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Raphael, Jacques [1 ]
Lefebvre, Cory [2 ]
Allan, Alison [2 ]
Helou, Joelle [3 ]
Boldt, Gabriel [1 ]
Vandenberg, Theodore [1 ]
Blanchette, Phillip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Oncol, Div Med Oncol, London Reg Canc Program, 800 Commissioners Rd East, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PHASE-II TRIAL; PLUS EXEMESTANE; PI3K/AKT/MTOR PATHWAY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMBINATION; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PROGRESSION; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11523-020-00770-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Everolimus plus exemestane is approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The role of everolimus is less well defined in other breast cancer phenotypes and in combination with other drugs. Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to standard of care (SoC) in MBC regardless of tumor phenotype and treatment type. Methods The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible randomized trials. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and pooled risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios for objective response rates, disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher toxicity were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses compared survival outcomes by tumor phenotype. Results Data from 2826 patients from eight trials were analyzed. The addition of everolimus to SoC reduced the risk of disease progression by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.90). This did not translate into an OS benefit (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80-1.13). In addition, everolimus improved the DCR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98), whereas it increased the risk of developing grade 3 or higher toxicity. The PFS benefit was more prominent for patients with hormone receptor-positive (+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (-) disease. For the HER2 (+) subgroup, the PFS benefit was restricted to patients with hormone receptor (-) disease. Conclusions Everolimus reduces the risk of disease progression in hormone receptor (+) MBC. In patients with HER2 (+) disease, the benefit is limited for those with hormone receptor (-) disease. Given the approval and use of newer drugs in MBC, clinical trials and real-world data are needed to confirm the benefit of everolimus and define the best treatment sequence strategy to adopt in that setting.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antioxidant Supplements and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Moradi-Joo, Mohammad
    Heidari, Saeed
    Seyed-Nezhad, Maryam
    Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
    Moosavi, Ahmad
    Davoodi, Sayed Hossein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 (04)
  • [32] Sarcopenia in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Roberto, Michela
    Barchiesi, Giacomo
    Resuli, Blerina
    Verrico, Monica
    Speranza, Iolanda
    Cristofani, Leonardo
    Pediconi, Federica
    Tomao, Federica
    Botticelli, Andrea
    Santini, Daniele
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [33] Effect of Probiotics in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Thu, May S.
    Ondee, Thunnicha
    Nopsopon, Tanawin
    Farzana, Izzati A. K.
    Fothergill, Joanne L.
    Hirankarn, Nattiya
    Campbell, Barry J.
    Pongpirul, Krit
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [34] Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Hedong
    Guo, Wei
    Shi, Wentao
    Yu, Yamei
    Zhang, Yunshuo
    Ye, Xiaofei
    He, Jia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [35] Human papillomaviruses and breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karachalios, Charalampos
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [36] Chatbots for breast cancer education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Shih-Jung
    Sun, Chin-Yu
    Chen, Dan-Ni
    Kang, Yi-No
    Hoang, Khanh Dinh
    Chen, Kee-Hsin
    Chen, Chiehfeng
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2025, 33 (01)
  • [37] Determinants of breast cancer in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Solbana, Lencho Kajela
    Chaka, Eshetu Ejeta
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [38] Lapatinib for breast cancer's systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Doulin
    Shi, Wentao
    Li, Jiqiang
    Wang, Jing
    Su, Ke
    Wei, Lei
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2012, 26
  • [39] Distress Thermometer in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Huihui
    Lv, Huimin
    Zeng, Huiai
    Niu, Limin
    Yan, Min
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 12 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [40] Association of Apatinib and Breast Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Hao
    Su, Wanying
    Lowe, Scott
    Zhou, Zhen
    Bentley, Rachel
    Zhou, Qin
    Cheng, Ce
    Guo, Xianwei
    Song, Qiuxia
    Liang, Qiwei
    Li, Ning
    Liang, Mingming
    Zhu, Yike
    Sun, Chenyu
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2022, 44