The use of multi-criteria assessment in developing a process model

被引:34
|
作者
Komuro, Rie
Ford, E. David
Reynolds, Joel H.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Appl Math, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Anchorage, AK 99503 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
process models; model assessment; Pareto; multi-criteria assessment; shoot extension;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.033
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological data frequently contain multiple patterns. A process model of the system producing the data should be able to recreate those patterns. We describe a method and associated software where components of the pattern are used as multiple criteria to assess a model during its construction. Successive improvements are made to the model so that it describes more components of the pattern effectively. The software, Pareto-Evolve is an evolutionary algorithm. Initially it creates many individual sets of model parameters, each is used in the model to produce results that are then compared to patterns in a data set. Different individuals may achieve different components of the pattern and Pareto-Evolve calculates those that are most effective and uses them to produce new individuals. This is done by changing parameter values of individuals, called mutation, or exchanging parameter values between individuals, called crossover. This process is repeated over many generations so that a most effective parameterization evolves. We illustrate this method with a model for hourly increments of extension of the leading shoot of a conifer tree. The particular task here is to model water uptake by the plant in response to water loss due to transpiration, calculate a water deficit between uptake and loss, and calculate contraction and re-expansion of shoot tissue due to diurnal changes in tissue water deficit. We choose criteria corresponding to different phases in the diurnal pattern of expansion and model for up to six consecutive days. A value is set marking the limit within which the model must achieve the criteria for it to be judged as success. This value is called a binary discrepancy measure. Pareto-Evolve is used to make multiple searches with successively smaller binary discrepancy measures until all criteria are no longer achieved. At this point different parameter sets achieve different groups of criteria and we use these as indicators of how the structure of the model must be improved to achieve an overall better fit. In our example we find that contraction is more rapid than re-expansion, which is a hysteresis effect, and that re-expansion of tissue continues after water deficit within the tissue is estimated to have been removed. We discuss how this method can be used in model development and particularly how multiple criteria assessment can be used in model development. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 330
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A multi-criteria model for the justification of IT investments
    Borenstein, D
    Betencourt, PRB
    INFOR, 2005, 43 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [32] THE USE OF AHP METHOD IN THE MULTI-CRITERIA TASK SOLVING PROCESS - CASE STUDY
    Korban, Zygmunt
    Profaska, Marek
    MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2014, 13 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [33] PROCESS OF MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS WITH SOFTWARE SUPPORT
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 17 (10): : 165 - 171
  • [34] COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-CRITERIA PROCESS DESIGN METHODOLOGY
    Kraviarova, D.
    Janosovsky, J.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, : 43 - 48
  • [35] Multi-criteria assessment of sustainable mobility of employees
    Zenko, Bernard
    Znidarsic, Martin
    Kontic, Davor
    Bohanec, Marko
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2024,
  • [36] THE MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF (CORPORATE) SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Cancer, Vesna
    Mulej, Matjaz
    IDIMT-2009: SYSTEM AND HUMANS, A COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP, 2009, 29 : 207 - 214
  • [37] Multi-criteria risk assessment of a construction project
    Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Turskis, Zenonas
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 : 129 - 133
  • [38] Groundwater Assessment Multi-criteria decision making
    Tanti, Kamal Kumar
    Singh, Prashant
    Roy, Swarnendu
    Chetia, Monisha
    Machahary, Ratamali
    Jhariya, Dalchand
    Chanu, Tongbram Malemnganbi
    Bora, Porag
    Gogoi, Priti Rekha
    Sah, Puja
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 118 (05): : 693 - 693
  • [39] Comparison of Selected Multi-criteria Assessment Methods
    Krzeminski, Michal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2015 (ICNAAM-2015), 2016, 1738
  • [40] Simulation and Multi-criteria Optimization under Uncertain Model Parameters of a Cumene Process
    Asprion, Norbert
    Blagov, Sergej
    Boettcher, Roger
    Schwientek, Jan
    Burger, Jakob
    von Harbou, Erik
    Bortz, Michael
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2017, 89 (05) : 665 - 674