The use of multi-criteria assessment in developing a process model

被引:34
|
作者
Komuro, Rie
Ford, E. David
Reynolds, Joel H.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Appl Math, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Anchorage, AK 99503 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
process models; model assessment; Pareto; multi-criteria assessment; shoot extension;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.033
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological data frequently contain multiple patterns. A process model of the system producing the data should be able to recreate those patterns. We describe a method and associated software where components of the pattern are used as multiple criteria to assess a model during its construction. Successive improvements are made to the model so that it describes more components of the pattern effectively. The software, Pareto-Evolve is an evolutionary algorithm. Initially it creates many individual sets of model parameters, each is used in the model to produce results that are then compared to patterns in a data set. Different individuals may achieve different components of the pattern and Pareto-Evolve calculates those that are most effective and uses them to produce new individuals. This is done by changing parameter values of individuals, called mutation, or exchanging parameter values between individuals, called crossover. This process is repeated over many generations so that a most effective parameterization evolves. We illustrate this method with a model for hourly increments of extension of the leading shoot of a conifer tree. The particular task here is to model water uptake by the plant in response to water loss due to transpiration, calculate a water deficit between uptake and loss, and calculate contraction and re-expansion of shoot tissue due to diurnal changes in tissue water deficit. We choose criteria corresponding to different phases in the diurnal pattern of expansion and model for up to six consecutive days. A value is set marking the limit within which the model must achieve the criteria for it to be judged as success. This value is called a binary discrepancy measure. Pareto-Evolve is used to make multiple searches with successively smaller binary discrepancy measures until all criteria are no longer achieved. At this point different parameter sets achieve different groups of criteria and we use these as indicators of how the structure of the model must be improved to achieve an overall better fit. In our example we find that contraction is more rapid than re-expansion, which is a hysteresis effect, and that re-expansion of tissue continues after water deficit within the tissue is estimated to have been removed. We discuss how this method can be used in model development and particularly how multiple criteria assessment can be used in model development. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 330
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Farm reorientation assessment model based on multi-criteria decision making
    Nikoloski, Trajce
    Udovc, Andrej
    Pavlovic, Martin
    Rajkovic, Uros
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 140 : 237 - 243
  • [22] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Assessment Model for Feasibility Studies of Transportation Projects
    Sal, Ozlem Battal
    Cubuk, M. Kursat
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2022, 25 (03): : 1191 - 1199
  • [23] An Early Multi-Criteria Risk Assessment Model: Requirement Engineering Perspective
    Chandani, Priyanka
    Gupta, Chetna
    JOURNAL OF CASES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 21 (02) : 51 - 64
  • [24] Operational Risk Management Using Multi-Criteria Assessment (AHP Model)
    Ristanovic, Vladimir
    Primorac, Dinko
    Kozina, Goran
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2021, 28 (02): : 678 - 683
  • [25] Life cycle integrated multi-criteria decision model for roof assessment
    Scolaro, Taylana Piccinini
    Ghisi, Enedir
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 336
  • [26] Preliminaries of the professional engineer's multi-criteria assessment model in Lithuania
    Juozapaitis, Algirdas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
    Navickas, Arunas Aleksandras
    Sakalauskiene, Lina
    Gedvilas, Dalius
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT: FLEXIBLE APPROACH, 2015, 122 : 235 - 238
  • [27] Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model
    Milutinovic, Biljana
    Stefanovic, Gordana
    Dassisti, Michele
    Markovic, Danijel
    Vuckovic, Goran
    ENERGY, 2014, 74 : 190 - 201
  • [28] eIdentification of a Multi-criteria Model of Location Assessment for Renewable Energy Sources
    Salabun, Wojciech
    Watrobski, Jaroslaw
    Piegat, Andrzej
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, ICAISC 2016, 2016, 9692 : 321 - 332
  • [29] Fuzzy model in the vulnerability multi-criteria assessment in water supply systems
    Zidko, Veruska
    Ramos, Helena M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HYDRAULICS: THEORETICAL, EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SOLUTIONS, 2010, : 323 - 326
  • [30] DEVELOPING A MULTI-CRITERIA FRAMEWORK FOR INNOVATION AND BIOLOGIC DRUGS ASSESSMENT DECISION MAKING IN EGYPT
    Fouad, S.
    ElMordy, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A702 - A702