The use of multi-criteria assessment in developing a process model

被引:34
|
作者
Komuro, Rie
Ford, E. David
Reynolds, Joel H.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Appl Math, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Anchorage, AK 99503 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
process models; model assessment; Pareto; multi-criteria assessment; shoot extension;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.033
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological data frequently contain multiple patterns. A process model of the system producing the data should be able to recreate those patterns. We describe a method and associated software where components of the pattern are used as multiple criteria to assess a model during its construction. Successive improvements are made to the model so that it describes more components of the pattern effectively. The software, Pareto-Evolve is an evolutionary algorithm. Initially it creates many individual sets of model parameters, each is used in the model to produce results that are then compared to patterns in a data set. Different individuals may achieve different components of the pattern and Pareto-Evolve calculates those that are most effective and uses them to produce new individuals. This is done by changing parameter values of individuals, called mutation, or exchanging parameter values between individuals, called crossover. This process is repeated over many generations so that a most effective parameterization evolves. We illustrate this method with a model for hourly increments of extension of the leading shoot of a conifer tree. The particular task here is to model water uptake by the plant in response to water loss due to transpiration, calculate a water deficit between uptake and loss, and calculate contraction and re-expansion of shoot tissue due to diurnal changes in tissue water deficit. We choose criteria corresponding to different phases in the diurnal pattern of expansion and model for up to six consecutive days. A value is set marking the limit within which the model must achieve the criteria for it to be judged as success. This value is called a binary discrepancy measure. Pareto-Evolve is used to make multiple searches with successively smaller binary discrepancy measures until all criteria are no longer achieved. At this point different parameter sets achieve different groups of criteria and we use these as indicators of how the structure of the model must be improved to achieve an overall better fit. In our example we find that contraction is more rapid than re-expansion, which is a hysteresis effect, and that re-expansion of tissue continues after water deficit within the tissue is estimated to have been removed. We discuss how this method can be used in model development and particularly how multiple criteria assessment can be used in model development. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 330
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Optimal Configuration of Business Process Model Families
    Sendelj, Ramo
    Ognjanovic, Ivana
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL, 2018, 47 (03): : 532 - 550
  • [42] A multi-criteria stern trawler selection model using the analytic hierarchy process
    Leheta, HW
    MARITIME TRANSPORTATION AND EXPLOITATION OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2: VOL 1: VESSELS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORTATION, 2005, : 1251 - 1257
  • [43] Multi-criteria supplier selection model using the analytic hierarchy process approach
    Yadav, Vinod
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (01) : 326 - 354
  • [44] Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model for multi-criteria analysis of internet of things
    Mashal, Ibrahim
    Alsaryrah, Osama
    KYBERNETES, 2020, 49 (10) : 2509 - 2520
  • [45] Developing a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model for Prefabrication Development Maturity of Construction Firms
    Dang, Pei
    Niu, Zhanwen
    Zhang, Guomin
    Gao, Shang
    Hou, Lei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 222397 - 222409
  • [46] Developing multi-criteria model for the protection of built heritage from the aspect of energy retrofitting
    Stanojevic, Ana D.
    Milosevic, Mimica R.
    Milosevic, Dusan M.
    Turnsek, Branko AJ.
    Jevremovic, Ljiljana Lj.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 250
  • [47] Evaluation of the suitability of sites for outdoor recreation using a multi-criteria assessment model
    Dagistanli, Celal
    Turan, Inci Demirag
    Dengiz, Orhan
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 11 (17)
  • [48] Multi-criteria analysis of input use in agriculture
    Gómez-Limón, JA
    Riesgo, L
    Arriaza, M
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 55 (03) : 541 - 564
  • [49] Multi-criteria optimization of the arable land use
    Ulez'ko, A., V
    Demidov, P., V
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRIPRODUCTS PROCESSING AND FARMING, 2020, 422
  • [50] Multi-criteria multi-model design optimization
    Bestle, D
    Eberhard, P
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON OPTIMIZATION OF MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 43 : 33 - 40