Experimental verification of ion range calculation in a treatment planning system using a flat-panel detector

被引:9
|
作者
Telsemeyer, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Ackermann, Benjamin [3 ]
Ecker, Swantje [3 ]
Jaekel, Oliver [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martisikova, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Med Phys Radiat Oncol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept RadioOncol & Radiat Therapy, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr HIT, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2014年 / 59卷 / 14期
关键词
radiotherapy; carbon ions; ion radiography; semiconductor detector; PROTON; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3737
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Heavy ion-beam therapy is a highly precise radiation therapy exploiting the characteristic interaction of ions with matter. The steep dose gradient of the Bragg curve allows the irradiation of targets with high-dose and a narrow dose penumbra around the target, in contrast to photon irradiation. This, however, makes heavy ion-beam therapy very sensitive to minor changes in the range calculation of the treatment planning system, as it has a direct influence on the outcome of the treatment. Our previous study has shown that ion radiography with an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector allows the measurement of the water equivalent thickness (WET) of an imaging object with good accuracy and high spatial resolution. In this study, the developed imaging technique is used to measure the WET distribution of a patient-like phantom, and these results are compared to the WET calculation of the treatment planning system. To do so, a measured two-dimensional map of the WET of an anthropomorphic phantom was compared to WET distributions based on x-ray computed tomography images as used in the treatment planning system. It was found that the WET maps agree well in the overall shape and two-dimensional distribution of WET values. Quantitatively, the ratio of the two-dimensional WET maps shows a mean of 1.004 with a standard deviation of 0.022. Differences were found to be concentrated at high WET gradients. This could be explained by the Bragg-peak degradation, which is measured in detail by ion radiography with the flat-panel detector, but is not taken into account in the treatment planning system. Excluding pixels exhibiting significant Bragg-peak degradation, the mean value of the ratio was found to be 1.000 with a standard deviation of 0.012. Employment of the amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for WET measurements allows us to detect uncertainties of the WET determination in the treatment planning process. This makes the investigated technique a very helpful tool to study the WET determination of critical and complex phantom cases.
引用
收藏
页码:3737 / 3747
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Development and characterization of a flat-panel detector-based microtomography system
    Lee, SC
    Kim, HK
    Chun, IK
    Cho, MH
    Cho, MH
    Lee, SY
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, PT 1-3, 2004, 270-273 : 245 - 251
  • [12] Image reconstruction in cardiac interventions using a small flat-panel detector
    Lauzier, Pascal Theriault
    Tang, Jie
    Qi, Zhihua
    Chen, Guang-Hong
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 7622
  • [13] Dynamic Chest X-Ray Using a Flat-Panel Detector System: Technique and Applications
    Hata, Akinori
    Yamada, Yoshitake
    Tanaka, Rie
    Nishino, Mizuki
    Hida, Tomoyuki
    Hino, Takuya
    Ueyama, Masako
    Yanagawa, Masahiro
    Kamitani, Takeshi
    Kurosaki, Atsuko
    Sanada, Shigeru
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    Ishigami, Kousei
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Kudoh, Shoji
    Hatabu, Hiroto
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (04) : 634 - 651
  • [14] Temporal-spatial characteristic evaluation in a dynamic flat-panel detector system
    Kawashima, H.
    Tanaka, R.
    Matsubara, K.
    Ichikawa, K.
    Sakuta, K.
    Minami, S.
    Hayashi, N.
    Sanada, S.
    Kawamura, M.
    Yamamoto, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 7622
  • [15] EXPOSURE DOSE INDEX BASED ON NOISE FACTOR ANALYSIS IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY: VERIFICATION USING DIRECT-TYPE FLAT-PANEL DETECTOR SYSTEM
    Maruyama, Sho
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2020, 192 (04) : 473 - 481
  • [16] Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: Experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis
    Metz, S
    Damoser, P
    Hollweck, R
    Roggel, R
    Engelke, C
    Woertler, K
    Renger, B
    Rummeny, EJ
    Link, TM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) : 776 - 784
  • [17] Automated analysis for the respiratory kinetics with the screening dynamic chest radiography using a flat-panel detector system
    Tanaka, R
    Sanada, S
    Kobayashi, T
    Suzuki, M
    Matsui, T
    Inoue, H
    [J]. CARS 2003: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 1256 : 179 - 186
  • [18] Optimum radiographic technique for chest radiography using a flat-panel digital detector
    Samei, E
    Dobbins, JT
    Chotas, HG
    Baydush, AH
    Floyd, CE
    Ravin, CE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 642 - 643
  • [19] Analysis and verification of the positioning accuracy of a flat-panel detector used for precision pointing in space optical communication
    Wang Xu
    Tu Cheng-Xiang
    Zhang Liang
    Wang Jian-Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRARED AND MILLIMETER WAVES, 2022, 41 (03) : 631 - 638
  • [20] Dose reduction of radiographs of the pediatric pelvis for diagnosing hip dysplasia using a digital flat-panel detector system
    Ludwig, K
    Ahlers, K
    Sandmann, C
    Gosheger, G
    Kloska, S
    Vieth, V
    Meier, N
    Heindel, W
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2003, 175 (01): : 112 - 117