共 50 条
Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil
被引:29
|作者:
van den Bergen, Bob
[1
]
Klomp, Dennis W. J.
[2
]
Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E.
[1
]
de Castro, Catalina Arteaga
[2
]
Boer, Vincent O.
[2
]
Kroeze, Hugo
[2
]
Luijten, Peter R.
[2
]
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
[1
]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词:
7T MRI;
prostate imaging;
RF safety;
endorectal coil;
microstrip array;
INTRINSIC THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY;
SAR;
D O I:
10.1002/nbm.1599
中图分类号:
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号:
071011 ;
摘要:
An endorectal coil and an eight-element microstrip array were compared for prostate imaging at 7 T. An extensive radiofrequency safety assessment was performed with the use of finite difference time domain simulations to determine safe scan parameters. These simulations showed that the endorectal coil can deliver substantially more B-1(+) to the prostate than can the microstrip array within the specific absorption rate safety guidelines. However, the B-1(+) field of the endorectal coil is very inhomogeneous, which makes the use of adiabatic pulses compulsory for T-1- or T-2-weighted imaging. As a consequence, a full prostate examination is only possible in a feasible amount of time when the microstrip array is used for T-1-and T-2-weighted imaging, whereas the endorectal coil is required for spectroscopic imaging. The pulse parameters were optimised within the specific absorption rate guidelines and thereafter used to provide a good illustration of the possibilities of prostate imaging at 7 T. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 365
页数:8
相关论文