Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil

被引:29
|
作者
van den Bergen, Bob [1 ]
Klomp, Dennis W. J. [2 ]
Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E. [1 ]
de Castro, Catalina Arteaga [2 ]
Boer, Vincent O. [2 ]
Kroeze, Hugo [2 ]
Luijten, Peter R. [2 ]
Lagendijk, Jan J. W. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
7T MRI; prostate imaging; RF safety; endorectal coil; microstrip array; INTRINSIC THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; SAR;
D O I
10.1002/nbm.1599
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
An endorectal coil and an eight-element microstrip array were compared for prostate imaging at 7 T. An extensive radiofrequency safety assessment was performed with the use of finite difference time domain simulations to determine safe scan parameters. These simulations showed that the endorectal coil can deliver substantially more B-1(+) to the prostate than can the microstrip array within the specific absorption rate safety guidelines. However, the B-1(+) field of the endorectal coil is very inhomogeneous, which makes the use of adiabatic pulses compulsory for T-1- or T-2-weighted imaging. As a consequence, a full prostate examination is only possible in a feasible amount of time when the microstrip array is used for T-1-and T-2-weighted imaging, whereas the endorectal coil is required for spectroscopic imaging. The pulse parameters were optimised within the specific absorption rate guidelines and thereafter used to provide a good illustration of the possibilities of prostate imaging at 7 T. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 365
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer
    Tirumani, S. H.
    Suh, C. H.
    Kim, K. W.
    Shinagare, A. B.
    Ramaiya, N. H.
    Fennessy, F. M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (02) : 157.e9 - 157.e19
  • [42] IS ENDORECTAL COIL PROSTATE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) NECESSARY FOR THE STAGING OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER?
    Choi, K. H.
    Lee, S. H.
    Chung, B. H.
    Oh, C. Y.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 319 - 319
  • [43] In Vivo Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging at 3 T with an Endorectal Coil
    Kobus, Thiele
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Wright, Alan J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Heerschap, Arend
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (05) : 1074 - 1080
  • [44] ENDORECTAL COIL MR-IMAGING FEATURES OF ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER
    TEMPANY, CM
    PICKETT, R
    SEITZER, SE
    GETTY, DJ
    SWETS, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 495 - 495
  • [45] CLINICAL UTILITY OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MR IMAGING OF THE PROSTATE-GLAND
    KREBS, TL
    SILVERMAN, JM
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 275 - 275
  • [46] Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: Comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Vargas, H. Alberto
    Nyman, Gregory
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Akin, Oguz
    Hricak, Hedvig
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (10) : E515 - E520
  • [47] PROSTATE-CANCER - LOCAL STAGING WITH ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MR IMAGING
    SCHNALL, MD
    IMAI, Y
    TOMASZEWSKI, J
    POLLACK, HM
    LENKINSKI, RE
    KRESSEL, HY
    RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (03) : 797 - 802
  • [48] Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil
    Mazaheri, Y.
    Afaq, A. A.
    Jung, S. I.
    Goldman, D. A.
    Wang, L.
    Asian, H.
    Zelefsky, M. J.
    Akin, O.
    Hricak, H.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [49] ACCURATE INTENSITY CORRECTION FOR ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MR-IMAGING OF THE PROSTATE
    SINGH, M
    NESSAIVER, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1993, 40 (04) : 1169 - 1173
  • [50] Endorectal coil MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: Evaluation of interreader variability
    Tempany, CM
    Gatsonis, C
    Herman, LM
    Caudry, DJ
    McNeil, BJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 675 - 675