Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil

被引:29
|
作者
van den Bergen, Bob [1 ]
Klomp, Dennis W. J. [2 ]
Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E. [1 ]
de Castro, Catalina Arteaga [2 ]
Boer, Vincent O. [2 ]
Kroeze, Hugo [2 ]
Luijten, Peter R. [2 ]
Lagendijk, Jan J. W. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
7T MRI; prostate imaging; RF safety; endorectal coil; microstrip array; INTRINSIC THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; SAR;
D O I
10.1002/nbm.1599
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
An endorectal coil and an eight-element microstrip array were compared for prostate imaging at 7 T. An extensive radiofrequency safety assessment was performed with the use of finite difference time domain simulations to determine safe scan parameters. These simulations showed that the endorectal coil can deliver substantially more B-1(+) to the prostate than can the microstrip array within the specific absorption rate safety guidelines. However, the B-1(+) field of the endorectal coil is very inhomogeneous, which makes the use of adiabatic pulses compulsory for T-1- or T-2-weighted imaging. As a consequence, a full prostate examination is only possible in a feasible amount of time when the microstrip array is used for T-1-and T-2-weighted imaging, whereas the endorectal coil is required for spectroscopic imaging. The pulse parameters were optimised within the specific absorption rate guidelines and thereafter used to provide a good illustration of the possibilities of prostate imaging at 7 T. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 365
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF IMAGE QUALITY AND PATIENT DISCOMFORT IN PROSTATE MRI: ENDORECTAL COIL VS. PELVIC PHASED ARRAY COIL
    Barth, Borna K.
    Cornelius, Alexander
    Nanz, Daniel
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E165 - E165
  • [22] Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil
    Barth, Borna K.
    Cornelius, Alexander
    Nanz, Daniel
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (11) : 2218 - 2226
  • [23] Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil
    Borna K. Barth
    Alexander Cornelius
    Daniel Nanz
    Daniel Eberli
    Olivio F. Donati
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 2218 - 2226
  • [24] Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils - Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Engelbrecht, Marc R.
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Hartman, Robert P.
    King, Bernard F.
    Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 1055 - 1065
  • [25] Comparison of Pelvic Phased-Array versus Endorectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer
    Kim, Bum Soo
    Kim, Tae-Hwan
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Yoo, Eun Sang
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (03) : 550 - 556
  • [26] Prostate Imaging: Evaluation of a Reusable Two-Channel Endorectal Receiver Coil for MR Imaging at 1.5 T
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Krieger, Axel
    Elliott, Christine
    Da Rosa, Michael R.
    Milot, Laurent
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (02) : 556 - 565
  • [27] A 32-channel receive array coil for bilateral breast imaging and spectroscopy at 7T
    Del Bosque, Romina
    Cui, Jiaming
    Ogier, Stephen
    Cheshkov, Sergey
    Dimitrov, Ivan E.
    Malloy, Craig
    Wright, Steven M.
    McDougall, Mary
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 85 (01) : 551 - 559
  • [28] A novel endorectal RF coil for high resolution MRI and spectroscopy of the prostate
    Zhang, HJ
    Song, XY
    Wang, XY
    Xu, PF
    Bao, SL
    PROGRESS IN NATURAL SCIENCE-MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 15 (05) : 472 - 476
  • [29] Performance Comparison of 1.5-T Endorectal Coil MRI with 3.0-T Nonendorectal Coil MRI in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Shah, Zarine K.
    Elias, Saba N.
    Abaza, Ronney
    Zynger, Debra L.
    DeRenne, Lawrence A.
    Knopp, Michael V.
    Guo, Beibei
    Schurr, Ryan
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    Jia, Guang
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : 467 - 474
  • [30] Use of perfluorocarbon compound in the endorectal coil to improve MR spectroscopy of the prostate
    Choi, Haesun
    Ma, Jingfei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 1055 - 1059