Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil

被引:29
|
作者
van den Bergen, Bob [1 ]
Klomp, Dennis W. J. [2 ]
Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E. [1 ]
de Castro, Catalina Arteaga [2 ]
Boer, Vincent O. [2 ]
Kroeze, Hugo [2 ]
Luijten, Peter R. [2 ]
Lagendijk, Jan J. W. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
7T MRI; prostate imaging; RF safety; endorectal coil; microstrip array; INTRINSIC THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; SAR;
D O I
10.1002/nbm.1599
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
An endorectal coil and an eight-element microstrip array were compared for prostate imaging at 7 T. An extensive radiofrequency safety assessment was performed with the use of finite difference time domain simulations to determine safe scan parameters. These simulations showed that the endorectal coil can deliver substantially more B-1(+) to the prostate than can the microstrip array within the specific absorption rate safety guidelines. However, the B-1(+) field of the endorectal coil is very inhomogeneous, which makes the use of adiabatic pulses compulsory for T-1- or T-2-weighted imaging. As a consequence, a full prostate examination is only possible in a feasible amount of time when the microstrip array is used for T-1-and T-2-weighted imaging, whereas the endorectal coil is required for spectroscopic imaging. The pulse parameters were optimised within the specific absorption rate guidelines and thereafter used to provide a good illustration of the possibilities of prostate imaging at 7 T. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 365
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T
    Sara Lewis
    Aasrith Ganti
    Pamela Argiriadi
    Ally Rosen
    Stefanie Hectors
    Sahar Semaan
    Christopher Song
    Steve Peti
    Maxwell Segall
    Kezia George
    Vaneela Jaikaran
    Sebastian Villa
    David Kestenbaum
    Nicholas Voutsinas
    John Doucette
    Ashutosh Tewari
    Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
    Bachir Taouli
    Cancer Imaging, 22
  • [12] Prostate cancer:: Body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T -: Comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance
    Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Takahashi, Satoru
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Knipscheer, Ben C.
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) : 184 - 195
  • [13] BI-Ground Microstrip Array Coil vs. Conventional Microstrip Array Coil for Mouse Imaging at 7 Tesla
    Hernandez, Ricardo
    Lopez Terrones, M. A.
    Jakob, P. M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 1494 : 118 - 120
  • [14] Development and Evaluation of a Multichannel Endorectal RF Coil for Prostate MRI at 7T in Combination With an External Surface Array
    Erturk, M. Arcan
    Tian, Jinfeng
    Van de Moortele, Pierre-Francois
    Adriany, Gregor
    Metzger, Gregory J.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (06) : 1279 - 1287
  • [15] Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Park, Kyung Kgi
    Choi, Kyung Hwa
    Lim, Beom Jin
    Kim, Joo Hee
    Lee, Seung Wook
    Chung, Byung Ha
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 667 - 672
  • [16] Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging
    Seung Hwan Lee
    Kyung Kgi Park
    Kyung Hwa Choi
    Beom Jin Lim
    Joo Hee Kim
    Seung Wook Lee
    Byung Ha Chung
    World Journal of Urology, 2010, 28 : 667 - 672
  • [17] Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal–pelvic phased-array coilsLocal staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
    Jurgen J. Fütterer
    Marc R. Engelbrecht
    Gerrit J. Jager
    Robert P. Hartman
    Bernard F. King
    Christina A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa
    J. Alfred Witjes
    Jelle O. Barentsz
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1055 - 1065
  • [18] Local staging of prostate cancer: endorectal coil versus pelvic phased array MR imaging
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (04): : F114 - F117
  • [19] Prostate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 1.5 tesla with endorectal coil versus 3.0 tesla without endorectal coil: comparison of spectral quality
    De Visschere, Pieter
    Nezzo, Marco
    Pattyn, Eva
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Van Praet, Charles
    Villeirs, Geert
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (04) : 636 - 641
  • [20] Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T - Preliminary results
    Torricelli, Pietro
    Cinquantini, Francesco
    Ligabue, Guido
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    Sighinolfi, Pamela
    Romagnoli, Renato
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (03) : 355 - 361