Quality of treatment plans and accuracy of in vivo portal dosimetry in hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Bedford, James L.
Smyth, Gregory
Hanson, Ian M.
Tree, Alison C.
Dearnaley, David P.
Hansen, Vibeke N.
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
关键词
IMRT; VMAT; Prostate; Treatment planning; Portal dosimetry; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; EPID DOSIMETRY; VERIFICATION; IMRT; VMAT; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Delivering selected parts of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams has the potential to increase plan quality by allowing specific aperture positioning. This study investigates the quality of treatment plans and the accuracy of in vivo portal dosimetry in such a hybrid approach for the case of prostate radiotherapy. Material and methods: Conformal and limited-modulation VMAT plans were produced, together with five hybrid IMRT/VMAT plans, in which 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of the segments were sequenced for IMRT, while the remainder were sequenced for VMAT. Integrated portal images were predicted for the plans. The plans were then delivered as a single hybrid beam using an Elekta Synergy accelerator with Agility head to a water-equivalent phantom and treatment time, isocentric dose and portal images were measured. Results: Increasing the IMRT percentage improves dose uniformity to the planning target volume (p < 0.01 for 50% IMRT or more), substantially reduces the volume of rectum irradiated to 65 Gy (p = 0.02 for 25% IMRT) and increases the monitor units (p < 0.001). Delivery time also increases substantially. All plans show accurate delivery of dose and reliable prediction of portal images. Conclusions: Hybrid IMRT/VMAT can be efficiently planned and delivered as a single beam sequence. Beyond 25% IMRT, the delivery time becomes unacceptably long, with increased risk of intrafraction motion, but 25% IMRT is an attractive compromise. Integrated portal images can be used to perform in vivo dosimetry for this technique. (C) 2016 The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 326
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Hidetaka Arimura
    Ryosuke Asamura
    Taka-aki Hirose
    Saiji Ohga
    Jun-ichi Fukunaga
    [J]. Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 137 - 148
  • [2] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Asamura, Ryosuke
    Hirose, Taka-aki
    Ohga, Saiji
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    [J]. RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 137 - 148
  • [3] Validation of Delivery Consistency for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    Woon, Wui Ann
    Ravindran, Paul B.
    Ekayanake, Piyasiri
    Lim, Yivonne Yih Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [4] A Planning Study to Compare Plans using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy or Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Anal Canal Cancer
    Dubois, J.
    Vieillot, S.
    Moscardo, C. Llacer
    Lemanski, C.
    Azria, D.
    Fenoglietto, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S729 - S730
  • [5] Treatment Efficiency of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Comparison With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Hall, William A.
    Fox, Timothy H.
    Jiang, Xiaojun
    Prabhu, Roshan S.
    Rossi, Peter J.
    Godette, Karen
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [6] Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Arc-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Tang, G.
    Earl, M.
    Luan, S.
    Wang, C.
    Naqvi, S.
    Yu, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [7] Dosimetry of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer and hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Lin, Hongxiao
    Sheng, Xuren
    Liu, Haowu
    Zhang, Peng
    Liu, Yunqin
    Zang, Chunbao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (06) : 1568 - 1574
  • [8] Dosimetric effects of weight loss or gain during volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Pair, Matthew L.
    Du, Weiliang
    Rojas, Hector D.
    Kanke, James E.
    McGuire, Sean E.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 251 - 254
  • [9] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [10] Optimized intensity-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer treatment
    Ma, LJ
    Yu, CX
    Earl, M
    Holmes, T
    Sarfaraz, M
    Li, XA
    Shepard, D
    Amin, P
    DiBiase, S
    Suntharalingam, M
    Mansfield, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 96 (06) : 379 - 384