Dosimetric effects of weight loss or gain during volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Pair, Matthew L. [1 ]
Du, Weiliang [2 ]
Rojas, Hector D. [1 ]
Kanke, James E. [1 ]
McGuire, Sean E. [1 ]
Lee, Andrew K. [1 ]
Kuban, Deborah A. [1 ]
Kudchadker, Rajat J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Patient weight loss; IMRT; VMAT; Source-to-surface distance; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; IMRT; IMPACT; ONCOLOGY; DOCUMENT; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2013.02.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Weight loss or gain during the course of radiation therapy for prostate cancer can alter the planned dose to the target volumes and critical organs. Typically, source-to-surface distance (SSD) measurements are documented by therapists on a weekly basis to ensure that patients' exterior surface and isocenter-to-skin surface distances remain stable. The radiation oncology team then determines whether the patient has undergone a physical change sufficient to require a new treatment plan. The effect of weight change (SSD increase or decrease) on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dosimetry is not well known, and it is unclear when rescanning or replanning is needed. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of weight change (SSD increase or decrease) on IMRT or VMAT dose delivery in patients with prostate cancer and to determine the SSD change threshold for replanning. Whether IMRT or VMAT provides better dose stability under weight change conditions was also determined. We generated clinical IMRT and VMAT prostate and seminal vesicle treatment plans for varying SSDs for 10 randomly selected patients with prostate cancer. The differences due to SSD change were quantified by a specific dose change for a specified volume of interest. The target mean dose, decreased or increased by 2.9% per 1-cm SSD decrease or increase in IMRT and by 3.6% in VMAT. If the SSD deviation is more than 1 cm, the radiation oncology team should determine whether to continue treatment without modifications, to adjust monitor units, or to resimulate and replan. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 254
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Brain Tumors: Dosimetric Comparison with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Ter-Antonyan, R.
    Yang, W.
    Geesey, C.
    Lain, D.
    Larner, J.
    Benedict, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3213 - +
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies
    Ali, Arif N.
    Dhabaan, Anees H.
    Jarrio, Christie S.
    Siddiqi, Arsalan K.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (03) : 271 - 275
  • [3] Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric study
    White, Peter
    Chan, Kit Chi
    Cheng, Ka Wai
    Chan, Ka Yiu
    Chau, Ming Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (03) : 532 - 545
  • [4] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Craniospinal Radiotherapy of Childhood
    Ozer, Elif Eda
    Coban, Yasin
    Cifter, Fulya
    Karacam, Songul
    Uzel, Omer
    Turkan, Tahir Sedat
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01): : 96 - 103
  • [5] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Ortega, Heather
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 190 - 192
  • [6] A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Mellon, Eric A.
    Javedan, Khosrow
    Strom, Tobin J.
    Moros, Eduardo G.
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    Fernandez, Daniel C.
    Wasserman, Stu G.
    Wilder, Richard B.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [7] Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Arc-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Tang, G.
    Earl, M.
    Luan, S.
    Wang, C.
    Naqvi, S.
    Yu, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [9] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Arc Therapy for Rectal Cancer
    Oskeroglu Kaplan, Sedenay
    Akboru, Halil
    Sarali, Yunus
    Altin, Suleyman
    Unsal, Mustafa
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 34 (02): : 59 - 65
  • [10] Analytical dosimetric study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer
    Samir, Fady
    Meaz, Talaat M.
    Hussiny, Fathi AEl
    Ahmed, Ahmed A.
    Mahmoud, Amr A.
    Refaat, Tamer
    Gawish, Ahmed
    Abouegylah, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (09) : 6239 - 6246