Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies

被引:21
|
作者
Ali, Arif N. [1 ,2 ]
Dhabaan, Anees H. [1 ,2 ]
Jarrio, Christie S. [1 ,2 ]
Siddiqi, Arsalan K. [1 ,2 ]
Landry, Jerome C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
RapidArc; Pancreas; VMAT; IMRT; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; FIXED FIELD IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; UNRESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; RAPIDARC; CARCINOMA; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been previously evaluated for several tumor sites and has been shown to provide significant dosimetric and delivery benefits when compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date, there have been no published full reports on the benefits of VMAT use in pancreatic patients compared with IMRT. Ten patients with pancreatic malignancies treated with either IMRT or VMAT were retrospectively identified. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each of the 10 patients using the same defined tumor volumes, organs at risk (OAR) volumes, dose, fractionation, and optimization constraints. The planning tumor volume (PTV) maximum dose (55.8 Gy vs. 54.4 Gy), PTV mean dose (53.9 Gy vs. 52.1 Gy), and conformality index (1.11 vs. 0.99) were statistically similar between the IMRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The VMAT plans had a statistically significant reduction in monitor units compared with the IMRT plans (1109 vs. 498, p < 0.001). In addition, the doses to the liver, small bowel, and spinal cord were comparable between the IMRT and VMAT plans. However, the VMAT plans demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the mean left kidney V-25 (9.4 Gy vs. 2.3 Gy, p = 0.018), mean right kidney V-15 (53.4 Gy vs. 45.9 Gy, p = 0.035), V-20 (32.2 Gy vs. 25.5 Gy, p = 0.016), and V-25 (21.7 Gy vs. 14.9 Gy, p = 0.001). VMAT was investigated in patients with pancreatic malignancies and compared with the current standard of IMRT. VMAT was found to have similar or improved dosimetric parameters for all endpoints considered. Specifically, VMAT provided reduced monitor units and improved bilateral kidney normal tissue dose. The clinical relevance of these benefits in the context of pancreatic cancer patients, however, is currently unclear and requires further investigation. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Brain Tumors: Dosimetric Comparison with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Ter-Antonyan, R.
    Yang, W.
    Geesey, C.
    Lain, D.
    Larner, J.
    Benedict, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3213 - +
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Craniospinal Radiotherapy of Childhood
    Ozer, Elif Eda
    Coban, Yasin
    Cifter, Fulya
    Karacam, Songul
    Uzel, Omer
    Turkan, Tahir Sedat
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01): : 96 - 103
  • [3] Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Arc-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Tang, G.
    Earl, M.
    Luan, S.
    Wang, C.
    Naqvi, S.
    Yu, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [4] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Tomotherapy, and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Radiation Dose Escalation of Hepatic Malignancies
    Bota, K.
    Lock, M.
    Ahmad, B.
    Fisher, B.
    Yartsev, S.
    Wong, E.
    Gaede, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S381 - S382
  • [5] Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric study
    White, Peter
    Chan, Kit Chi
    Cheng, Ka Wai
    Chan, Ka Yiu
    Chau, Ming Chun
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (03) : 532 - 545
  • [6] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy
    Thibault, Isabelle
    Wronski, Matt
    Korol, Renee
    Chu, William
    Helou, Joelle
    Erler, Darby
    Chung, Hans T.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 5 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [7] Dosimetric analysis and comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for liver carcinoma
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Schnell, Erich
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 138 - 140
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Ortega, Heather
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 190 - 192
  • [9] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [10] A Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma
    Eldebawy E.
    Rashed Y.A.
    AlKhaldi M.
    Day E.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2020, 17 (06) : 374 - 379