Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies

被引:21
|
作者
Ali, Arif N. [1 ,2 ]
Dhabaan, Anees H. [1 ,2 ]
Jarrio, Christie S. [1 ,2 ]
Siddiqi, Arsalan K. [1 ,2 ]
Landry, Jerome C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
RapidArc; Pancreas; VMAT; IMRT; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; FIXED FIELD IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; UNRESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; RAPIDARC; CARCINOMA; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been previously evaluated for several tumor sites and has been shown to provide significant dosimetric and delivery benefits when compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date, there have been no published full reports on the benefits of VMAT use in pancreatic patients compared with IMRT. Ten patients with pancreatic malignancies treated with either IMRT or VMAT were retrospectively identified. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each of the 10 patients using the same defined tumor volumes, organs at risk (OAR) volumes, dose, fractionation, and optimization constraints. The planning tumor volume (PTV) maximum dose (55.8 Gy vs. 54.4 Gy), PTV mean dose (53.9 Gy vs. 52.1 Gy), and conformality index (1.11 vs. 0.99) were statistically similar between the IMRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The VMAT plans had a statistically significant reduction in monitor units compared with the IMRT plans (1109 vs. 498, p < 0.001). In addition, the doses to the liver, small bowel, and spinal cord were comparable between the IMRT and VMAT plans. However, the VMAT plans demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the mean left kidney V-25 (9.4 Gy vs. 2.3 Gy, p = 0.018), mean right kidney V-15 (53.4 Gy vs. 45.9 Gy, p = 0.035), V-20 (32.2 Gy vs. 25.5 Gy, p = 0.016), and V-25 (21.7 Gy vs. 14.9 Gy, p = 0.001). VMAT was investigated in patients with pancreatic malignancies and compared with the current standard of IMRT. VMAT was found to have similar or improved dosimetric parameters for all endpoints considered. Specifically, VMAT provided reduced monitor units and improved bilateral kidney normal tissue dose. The clinical relevance of these benefits in the context of pancreatic cancer patients, however, is currently unclear and requires further investigation. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Dosimetric Analysis of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Vs Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
    Chiang, B.
    Hibbitts, K.
    Ortega, H.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E305 - E305
  • [22] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated and volumetric arc radiation therapy for gastric cancer
    Li, Zhiping
    Zeng, Jianshuang
    Wang, Zi
    Zhu, Hong
    Wei, Yuquan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 8 (04) : 1427 - 1434
  • [23] Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy For Liver Carcinoma
    Chiang, B.
    Schnell, E.
    Hibbitts, K.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E750 - E750
  • [24] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities
    Lawless, Anna K.
    Fangupo, Nonga
    Estoesta, Reuben Patrick
    Perez, Gino
    Alzaidi, Samara
    Heller, Gillian
    Hill, Robin
    Hong, Angela M.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12 (04) : E306 - E311
  • [25] Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Angiosarcoma of the Scalp
    Mizuno, Tomoki
    Tomita, Natsuo
    Takaoka, Taiki
    Tomida, Masashi
    Fukuma, Hiroshi
    Tsuchiya, Takahiro
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
  • [26] The role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in gynaecological radiation therapy: A dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus VMAT
    Knapp, Penelope
    Eva, Belinda
    Reseigh, Gemma
    Gibbs, Adrian
    Sim, Lucy
    Daly, Tiffany
    Cox, Judith
    Bernard, Anne
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 66 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [27] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Whole Brain Hippocampal Sparing Radiation Therapy Treatments
    Kendall, E.
    Higby, C.
    Algan, O.
    Ahmad, S.
    Hossain, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3587 - 3587
  • [28] SMARTARC-BASED VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER: A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON WITH BOTH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY AND HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY
    Clemente, Stefania
    Wu, BinBin
    Sanguineti, Giuseppe
    Fusco, Vincenzo
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Wong, John
    McNutt, Todd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04): : 1248 - 1255
  • [29] A dosimetric comparative study: Volumetric modulated arc therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of nasal cavity carcinomas
    Kham Nguyen
    Cummings, David
    Lanza, Vincent C.
    Morris, Kathleen
    Wang, Congjun
    Sutton, Jordan
    Garcia, John
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 225 - 232
  • [30] Dosimetric effects of weight loss or gain during volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Pair, Matthew L.
    Du, Weiliang
    Rojas, Hector D.
    Kanke, James E.
    McGuire, Sean E.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 251 - 254