Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities

被引:1
|
作者
Lawless, Anna K. [1 ,2 ]
Fangupo, Nonga [1 ]
Estoesta, Reuben Patrick [1 ]
Perez, Gino [1 ]
Alzaidi, Samara [1 ]
Heller, Gillian [3 ]
Hill, Robin [1 ,4 ]
Hong, Angela M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Natl Hlth & Med Res Council NHMRC, Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; PHASE-2;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Radiation therapy is a standard part of limb conserving therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk of recurrence. Toxic effects increase with radiation dose and volume of normal tissue irradiated. This study sought to compare dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to investigate the optimal planning technique. Methods and Materials: Twenty patients with extremity STS who underwent preoperative radiation therapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) between 2016 and 2020 at a specialised sarcoma center were included. The original treatment techniques were sliding window IMRT or 3-dimensional conformal. VMAT plans were retrospectively generated according to the original tumor and organ-at-risk constraints. Quality assurance was performed as per departmental protocol. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dosimetric parameters (for planning target volume [PTV], in-field bone, and soft tissue structures), monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. Results: Median patient age was 65 years and the majority were male (n = 14, 70%). The most common subtype was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 14, 70%), and most tumors were located on the thigh (n = 12, 60%). Median PTV was 1110 cm(3) and median volume of in-field bone 236 cm(3). VMAT plans had significantly lower average MU (480 vs 862 MU, P < .001) and overall treatment time (300 vs 153 seconds, P < .001). PTV coverage favored VMAT, with marginally higher mean, minimum, and maximum doses and higher conformity index. However, differences were not statistically significant. Dose to infield bone and soft tissue structures were similar or slightly lower with VMAT. Conclusions: In extremity STS, VMAT plans demonstrated a favorable trend toward tumor coverage and dose conformity compared with IMRT along with significantly lower MUs and half the overall treatment time. (C) 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E306 / E311
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Ortega, Heather
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 190 - 192
  • [2] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Brain Tumors: Dosimetric Comparison with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Ter-Antonyan, R.
    Yang, W.
    Geesey, C.
    Lain, D.
    Larner, J.
    Benedict, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3213 - +
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies
    Ali, Arif N.
    Dhabaan, Anees H.
    Jarrio, Christie S.
    Siddiqi, Arsalan K.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (03) : 271 - 275
  • [4] Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
    Hibbitts, K.
    Chiang, B.
    Ortega, H.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E623 - E623
  • [5] Comparison of Dosimetric Analysis of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Vs Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
    Chiang, B.
    Hibbitts, K.
    Ortega, H.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E305 - E305
  • [6] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated and volumetric arc radiation therapy for gastric cancer
    Li, Zhiping
    Zeng, Jianshuang
    Wang, Zi
    Zhu, Hong
    Wei, Yuquan
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 8 (04) : 1427 - 1434
  • [7] Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy For Liver Carcinoma
    Chiang, B.
    Schnell, E.
    Hibbitts, K.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E750 - E750
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Craniospinal Radiotherapy of Childhood
    Ozer, Elif Eda
    Coban, Yasin
    Cifter, Fulya
    Karacam, Songul
    Uzel, Omer
    Turkan, Tahir Sedat
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01): : 96 - 103
  • [9] The role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in gynaecological radiation therapy: A dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus VMAT
    Knapp, Penelope
    Eva, Belinda
    Reseigh, Gemma
    Gibbs, Adrian
    Sim, Lucy
    Daly, Tiffany
    Cox, Judith
    Bernard, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 66 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [10] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Whole Brain Hippocampal Sparing Radiation Therapy Treatments
    Kendall, E.
    Higby, C.
    Algan, O.
    Ahmad, S.
    Hossain, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3587 - 3587