Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies

被引:21
|
作者
Ali, Arif N. [1 ,2 ]
Dhabaan, Anees H. [1 ,2 ]
Jarrio, Christie S. [1 ,2 ]
Siddiqi, Arsalan K. [1 ,2 ]
Landry, Jerome C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
RapidArc; Pancreas; VMAT; IMRT; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; FIXED FIELD IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; UNRESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; RAPIDARC; CARCINOMA; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been previously evaluated for several tumor sites and has been shown to provide significant dosimetric and delivery benefits when compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date, there have been no published full reports on the benefits of VMAT use in pancreatic patients compared with IMRT. Ten patients with pancreatic malignancies treated with either IMRT or VMAT were retrospectively identified. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each of the 10 patients using the same defined tumor volumes, organs at risk (OAR) volumes, dose, fractionation, and optimization constraints. The planning tumor volume (PTV) maximum dose (55.8 Gy vs. 54.4 Gy), PTV mean dose (53.9 Gy vs. 52.1 Gy), and conformality index (1.11 vs. 0.99) were statistically similar between the IMRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The VMAT plans had a statistically significant reduction in monitor units compared with the IMRT plans (1109 vs. 498, p < 0.001). In addition, the doses to the liver, small bowel, and spinal cord were comparable between the IMRT and VMAT plans. However, the VMAT plans demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the mean left kidney V-25 (9.4 Gy vs. 2.3 Gy, p = 0.018), mean right kidney V-15 (53.4 Gy vs. 45.9 Gy, p = 0.035), V-20 (32.2 Gy vs. 25.5 Gy, p = 0.016), and V-25 (21.7 Gy vs. 14.9 Gy, p = 0.001). VMAT was investigated in patients with pancreatic malignancies and compared with the current standard of IMRT. VMAT was found to have similar or improved dosimetric parameters for all endpoints considered. Specifically, VMAT provided reduced monitor units and improved bilateral kidney normal tissue dose. The clinical relevance of these benefits in the context of pancreatic cancer patients, however, is currently unclear and requires further investigation. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Hidetaka Arimura
    Ryosuke Asamura
    Taka-aki Hirose
    Saiji Ohga
    Jun-ichi Fukunaga
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 137 - 148
  • [42] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Asamura, Ryosuke
    Hirose, Taka-aki
    Ohga, Saiji
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 137 - 148
  • [43] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for adult craniospinal irradiation-A comparison with traditional techniques
    Studenski, Matthew T.
    Shen, Xinglei
    Yu, Yan
    Xiao, Ying
    Shi, Wenyin
    Biswas, Tithi
    Werner-Wasik, Maria
    Harrison, Amy S.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [44] Stereotactic body radiation therapy planning with duodenal sparing using Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A dosimetric analysis
    Kumar, Rachit
    Wild, Aaron T.
    Ziegler, Mark A.
    Hooker, Ted K.
    Dah, Samson D.
    Tran, Phuoc T.
    Kang, Jun
    Smith, Koren
    Zeng, Jing
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Tryggestad, Erik
    Ford, Eric
    Herman, Joseph M.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [45] Dosimetric analysis of testicular doses in prostate intensity-modulated and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy at different energy levels
    Onal, Cem
    ArsIan, Gungor
    Dolek, Yemliha
    Efe, Esma
    Medical Dosimetry, 2016, 41 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [46] Comparative dosimetric analysis of intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Ali, M. Athar
    Babaiah, M.
    George, G.
    Madhusudhan, N.
    Ramalingam, K.
    Kumar, S. Ashok
    Karthikeyan, K.
    Anantharaman, A.
    Shanu, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S188 - S188
  • [47] Radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with 0° and 90° collimator intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Sang, Yong
    Shan, Guoping
    Shao, Kainan
    Hu, Fujun
    Chen, Jing
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9 (1-2) : 53 - 58
  • [48] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma Treatment
    Kaptan, I.
    Ugurluer, G.
    Ispir, B.
    Akdeniz, Y.
    Serin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [49] Comparison of dosimetric benefits in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients among intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and tomotherapy
    Xiong, W.
    Guoqiang, X.
    Wang, Q.
    Xu, T.
    Cao, R.
    Zhu, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S793 - S793
  • [50] Dosimetric Comparison of Hypofractionated Regimen in Breast Cancer Using Two Different Techniques: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Prasun, Pallav
    Kharade, Vipin
    Pal, Vikas
    Gupta, Manish
    Das, Saikat
    Pasricha, Rajesh
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)