Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties

被引:35
|
作者
Dinges, Eric [1 ]
Felderman, Nicole [1 ]
McGuire, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Brandie [1 ]
Bhatia, Sudershan [1 ,2 ]
Mott, Sarah [2 ]
Buatti, John [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dongxu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiat Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Holden Comprehens Canc Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Bone marrow sparing; Cervical cancer; Proton; Robustness; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; INTER-FRACTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; PROSTATE; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTORS; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: This study evaluates the potential efficacy and robustness of functional bone marrow sparing (BMS) using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for cervical cancer, with the goal of reducing hematologic toxicity. Material and methods: IMPT plans with prescription dose of 45 Gy were generated for ten patients who have received BMS intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMRT). Functional bone marrow was identified by F-18-flourothymidine positron emission tomography. IMPT plans were designed to minimize the volume of functional bone marrow receiving 5-40 Gy while maintaining similar target coverage and healthy organ sparing as IMRT. IMPT robustness was analyzed with +/- 3% range uncertainty errors and/or +/- 3 mm translational setup errors in all three principal dimensions. Results: In the static scenario, the median dose volume reductions for functional bone marrow by IMPT were: 32% for V-5Gy, 47% for V-10Gy, 54% for V-20Gy, and 57% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01 compared to IMRT. With assumed errors, even the worst-case reductions by IMPT were: 23% for V-5Gy, 37% for V-10Gy, 41% for V-20Gy, and 39% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01. Conclusions: The potential sparing of functional bone marrow by IMPT for cervical cancer is significant and robust under realistic systematic range uncertainties and clinically relevant setup errors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robustness of a New Gradient Match Method in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy of Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) Using Independent Isocenter Setup
    Zhou, J.
    Wang, Y.
    Gartin, C.
    Matthews, A.
    Esiashvili, N.
    Shu, H. K. G.
    Zhong, J.
    McDonald, M. W.
    Liu, T.
    Eaton, B. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E690 - E691
  • [42] Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
    Qin, Xiaohang
    Gong, Guanzhong
    Wang, Lizhen
    Su, Ya
    Yin, Yong
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [43] Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
    Xiaohang Qin
    Guanzhong Gong
    Lizhen Wang
    Ya Su
    Yong Yin
    Radiation Oncology, 17
  • [44] A Dosimetric Analysis of Tomotherapy Based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With and Without Bone Marrow Sparing in Gynecologic Malignancies
    Platta, Christopher S.
    Bayliss, Adam
    McHaffie, Derek
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Straub, Margaret R.
    Bradley, Kristin A.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2013, 12 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [45] Quantifying the Dosimetric Impact of Proton Range Uncertainties on RBE-Weighted Dose Distributions in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Bilateral Head and Neck Cancer
    Rana, Suresh
    Padannayil, Noufal Manthala
    Tran, Linh
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    Saeed, Hina
    Kasper, Michael
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 3690 - 3697
  • [46] Robustness of integrated boost plans for oesophageal cancer: arctherapy vs intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Warren, S.
    Partridge, M.
    Hurt, C.
    Crosby, T.
    Hawkins, M. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S254 - S255
  • [47] Impact of Beam Size on the Plan Robustness for Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Baba, H.
    Hotta, K.
    Tachibana, H.
    Motegi, K.
    Sugama, Y.
    Akimoto, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E266 - E266
  • [48] Evaluation of replanning in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Factors influencing plan robustness
    Deiter, Noelle
    Chu, Felicia
    Lenards, Nishele
    Hunzeker, Ashley
    Lang, Karen
    Mundy, Daniel
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (04) : 384 - 392
  • [49] The Impact of Body Weight Change on the Dose Distribution of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Cervical Cancer
    Wang, D.
    Bhatia, S.
    Dinges, E.
    Gross, B.
    Buatti, J.
    McGuire, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S916 - S917
  • [50] Intensity modulated proton therapy versus various advanced photon techniques in cervical cancer patients
    Marnitz, S.
    Fogliata, A.
    Nicolini, G.
    Vanetti, E.
    Clivio, A.
    Wlodarczyk, W.
    Koehler, C.
    Neumann, O.
    Budach, V.
    Cozzi, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S68 - S69