Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties

被引:35
|
作者
Dinges, Eric [1 ]
Felderman, Nicole [1 ]
McGuire, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Brandie [1 ]
Bhatia, Sudershan [1 ,2 ]
Mott, Sarah [2 ]
Buatti, John [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dongxu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiat Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Holden Comprehens Canc Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Bone marrow sparing; Cervical cancer; Proton; Robustness; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; INTER-FRACTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; PROSTATE; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTORS; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: This study evaluates the potential efficacy and robustness of functional bone marrow sparing (BMS) using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for cervical cancer, with the goal of reducing hematologic toxicity. Material and methods: IMPT plans with prescription dose of 45 Gy were generated for ten patients who have received BMS intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMRT). Functional bone marrow was identified by F-18-flourothymidine positron emission tomography. IMPT plans were designed to minimize the volume of functional bone marrow receiving 5-40 Gy while maintaining similar target coverage and healthy organ sparing as IMRT. IMPT robustness was analyzed with +/- 3% range uncertainty errors and/or +/- 3 mm translational setup errors in all three principal dimensions. Results: In the static scenario, the median dose volume reductions for functional bone marrow by IMPT were: 32% for V-5Gy, 47% for V-10Gy, 54% for V-20Gy, and 57% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01 compared to IMRT. With assumed errors, even the worst-case reductions by IMPT were: 23% for V-5Gy, 37% for V-10Gy, 41% for V-20Gy, and 39% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01. Conclusions: The potential sparing of functional bone marrow by IMPT for cervical cancer is significant and robust under realistic systematic range uncertainties and clinically relevant setup errors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Neo-Adjuvant Therapy of Inoperable Cervical Cancer in a Patient with Severe Thrombocytopenia
    Simeonova, Anna
    Abo-Madyan, Yasser
    Stroebel, Philipp
    Kleine, Werner
    Schwarzbach, Matthias
    Fleckenstein, Katharina
    Wenz, Frederik
    ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 33 (04): : 189 - 192
  • [22] Evaluation of Robustness to Setup and Range Uncertainties for Head and Neck Patients Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Malyapa, Robert
    Lowe, Matthew
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Weber, Damien C.
    Albertini, Francesca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 154 - 162
  • [23] Dosimetric Comparison of Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Theraphy Versus Conventional Techniques for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
    Tiryaki, H.
    Ahn, K.
    Roeske, J.
    Mundt, A.
    Mell, L.
    Aydogan, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [24] Dosimetric analysis of tomotherapy-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without bone marrow sparing for the treatment of cervical cancer
    Fuli Zhang
    Weidong Xu
    Huayong Jiang
    Yadi Wang
    Junmao Gao
    Qingzhi Liu
    Na Lu
    Diandian Chen
    Bo Yao
    Jianping Chen
    Heliang He
    Oncology and Translational Medicine, 2015, 1 (03) : 135 - 139
  • [25] Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer
    Mell, Loren K.
    Tiryaki, Hanfi
    Ahn, Kang-Hyun
    Mundt, Arno J.
    Roeske, John C.
    Aydogan, Bulent
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (05): : 1504 - 1510
  • [26] Feasibility of bone marrow sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy to spare active bone marrow in cervical and vaginal cancer patients: a retrospective dosimetric analysis
    Beavan, Michaela
    Dundas, Kylie
    Hudson, Felicity
    Surjan, Yolanda
    Lau, Annie
    Deshpande, Shrikant
    Lim, Karen
    Do, Viet
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (04) : 379 - 388
  • [27] BONE MARROW-SPARING INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR STAGE I SEMINOMA
    Zilli, T.
    Boudreau, C.
    Doucet, R.
    Alizadeh, M.
    Lambert, C.
    Nguyen, T. V.
    Taussky, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S399 - S399
  • [28] Bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy for Stage I seminoma
    Zilli, Thomas
    Boudreau, Chantal
    Doucet, Robert
    Alizadeh, Moein
    Lambert, Carole
    Nguyen, Thu van
    Taussky, Daniel
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2011, 50 (04) : 555 - 562
  • [29] Is it time for bone marrow sparing radiation therapy to be standard of care in cervical cancer?
    Ayala-Peacock, Diandra N.
    Chino, Junzo P.
    CANCER, 2023, 129 (13) : 1962 - 1965
  • [30] Inter-fraction motion robustness and organ sparing potential of proton therapy for cervical cancer
    Gort, Elske M.
    Beukema, Jannet C.
    Matysiak, Witold
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    Aluwini, Shafak
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Both, Stefan
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : 194 - 200