Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties

被引:35
|
作者
Dinges, Eric [1 ]
Felderman, Nicole [1 ]
McGuire, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Brandie [1 ]
Bhatia, Sudershan [1 ,2 ]
Mott, Sarah [2 ]
Buatti, John [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dongxu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiat Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Holden Comprehens Canc Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Bone marrow sparing; Cervical cancer; Proton; Robustness; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; INTER-FRACTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; PROSTATE; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTORS; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: This study evaluates the potential efficacy and robustness of functional bone marrow sparing (BMS) using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for cervical cancer, with the goal of reducing hematologic toxicity. Material and methods: IMPT plans with prescription dose of 45 Gy were generated for ten patients who have received BMS intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMRT). Functional bone marrow was identified by F-18-flourothymidine positron emission tomography. IMPT plans were designed to minimize the volume of functional bone marrow receiving 5-40 Gy while maintaining similar target coverage and healthy organ sparing as IMRT. IMPT robustness was analyzed with +/- 3% range uncertainty errors and/or +/- 3 mm translational setup errors in all three principal dimensions. Results: In the static scenario, the median dose volume reductions for functional bone marrow by IMPT were: 32% for V-5Gy, 47% for V-10Gy, 54% for V-20Gy, and 57% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01 compared to IMRT. With assumed errors, even the worst-case reductions by IMPT were: 23% for V-5Gy, 37% for V-10Gy, 41% for V-20Gy, and 39% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01. Conclusions: The potential sparing of functional bone marrow by IMPT for cervical cancer is significant and robust under realistic systematic range uncertainties and clinically relevant setup errors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Skin Sparing Optimization Method Utilizing Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in Breast Cancer Therapy
    Yu, J.
    Greco, K.
    Gutierrez, A.
    McKenzie, C.
    Mehta, M.
    Fagundes, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E267 - E267
  • [32] Assessment of robustness against setup uncertainties using probabilistic scenarios in lung cancer: a comparison of proton with photon therapy
    Teoh, Suliana
    George, Ben
    Fiorini, Francesca
    Vallis, Katherine A.
    Van den Heuvel, Frank
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107):
  • [33] Characterization of Photon Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Robustness in Patients With Prostate Cancer as a Proposed Benchmark for Proton Therapy Robustness Evaluation
    Maas, Jared A.
    Mcdonald, Andrew M.
    Cardan, Rex A.
    Snider, James W.
    Fiveash, John B.
    Kole, Adam J.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14 (01) : e68 - e74
  • [34] Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial of Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin for Stage IB-IVA Cervical Cancer
    Mell, L. K.
    Sirak, I.
    Wei, L.
    Tarnawski, R. R.
    Mahantshetty, U. M.
    Yashar, C. M.
    McHale, M. T.
    Wright, M. E.
    Pritz, J.
    Straube, W.
    Xu, R.
    Kasaova, L.
    Michalski, J. M.
    Bosch, W. R.
    Followill, D. S.
    Schwarz, J. K.
    Honerkamp-Smith, G.
    Leif, J. L.
    Saenz, C. C.
    Einck, J. P.
    Koonings, P. P.
    Harrison, T. A.
    Khorprasert, C.
    Shi, M.
    Plaxe, S. C.
    Mundt, A. J., III
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S13 - S13
  • [35] Limited Impact of Setup and Range Uncertainties, Breathing Motion, and Interplay Effects in Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Inoue, Tatsuya
    Widder, Joachim
    van Dijk, Lisanne V.
    Takegawa, Hideki
    Koizumi, Masahiko
    Takashina, Masaaki
    Usui, Keisuke
    Kurokawa, Chie
    Sugimoto, Satoru
    Saito, Anneyuko I.
    Sasai, Keisuke
    van't Veld, Aart A.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (03): : 661 - 669
  • [36] Robustness Recipes for Minimax Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients
    van der Voort, Sebastian
    van de Water, Steven
    Perko, Zoltan
    Heijmen, Ben
    Lathouwers, Danny
    Hoogeman, Mischa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 163 - 170
  • [37] Impact of daily image guided patient setup on bone marrow sparing in cervical cancer patients undergoing IMRT
    Lewis, J. H.
    Tyagi, N.
    Yashar, C. M.
    Vo, D.
    Mell, L. K.
    Jiang, S. B.
    Mundt, A. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S582 - S583
  • [38] The Effect of Anatomical Changes on Target Coverage in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Cervical Cancer
    Wang, D.
    Bhatia, S. K.
    Felderman, N. K.
    Dinges, E.
    Patel, S. C.
    Buatti, J.
    McGuire, S. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E262 - E262
  • [39] Dose-volume comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for cervical esophageal cancer
    Kato, Takahiro
    Ono, Takashi
    Narita, Yuki
    Komori, Shinya
    Murakami, Masao
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [40] Absolute volume of active bone marrow and total bone marrow spared in anal cancer patients using intensity modulated proton versus volumetric arc therapy
    Prasad, Rahul N.
    Freese, Christopher
    Sudhoff, Mickaela
    Meier, Teresa
    Lewis, Luke
    Mascia, Anthony
    Wolf, Eric
    Kharofa, Jordan
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) : 69 - 75