Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process

被引:33
|
作者
Sun, Hongyue [1 ]
Rao, Prahalad K. [2 ]
Kong, Zhenyu [3 ]
Deng, Xinwei [4 ]
Jin, Ran [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Grado Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Stat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Additive manufacturing (AM); functional quantitative and qualitative (QQ) models; fused deposition modeling (FDM); in situ process variables; QQ responses; OF-THE-ART; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; REGRESSION-MODELS; FDM MACHINE; OPTIMIZATION; DISCRETE; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2017.2763609
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables flexible part geometry and functionality, and reduces product development life cycle by direct layer-wise fabrication from CAD files. In the last decade, great achievements are made on AM materials, machines, processes, etc. However, the quality of the AM parts is still questionable for industrial specifications. On the one hand, AM part quality variables can be either quantitative, such as dimensional accuracy, or qualitative, such as binary indicators for voids, missing features, or surface roughness. On the other hand, both offline process setting variables and functional in situ process variables can be measured and modeled with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) quality response variables. In this paper, the QQ quality response variables are modeled by offline process setting variables and in situ process variables via functional QQ models. The modeling of these in situ process variables provides the basis for real-time monitoring and control for AM processes. Simulation studies and experimental data from a fused deposition modeling process are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners-Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have attracted much attention and showed many advantages over the traditional subtractive manufacturing processes. However, the product quality issues make AM intractable for high-quality parts in industrial applications. This paper aims to address the quality issues by modeling both quantitative quality variables, such as dimensional accuracy, and qualitative quality variables, such as the binary (go/no-go) indicator for surface conditions. Both offline process setting variables and in situ process variables are used in the model as predictors. Such a model is important for systematically quality evaluation of AM parts, and provides the basis for future process monitoring and control. The merits of the proposed method are demonstrated with simulation studies and a case study in a fused deposition modeling process.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fused deposition modeling process for building cellular solids with closed cells
    Popescu, D. P.
    Annals of DAAAM for 2006 & Proceedings of the 17th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON MECHATRONICS AND ROBOTICS, 2006, : 313 - 314
  • [42] Functional Graphical Models for Manufacturing Process Modeling
    Sun, Hongyue
    Huang, Shuai
    Jin, Ran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 14 (04) : 1612 - 1621
  • [43] Image Monitoring Study on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Fabrication Process
    Tsai, Hung-Yin
    Hsu, Wei-Yuan
    Chen, Yi-Hung
    Tsao, Che-Chih
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 2018, 39 (06): : 537 - 544
  • [44] Influence of temperature on polymer parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process
    Bhalodi, Deep
    Zalavadiya, Karan
    Gurrala, Pavan Kumar
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 41 (03)
  • [45] Influence of temperature on polymer parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process
    Deep Bhalodi
    Karan Zalavadiya
    Pavan Kumar Gurrala
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2019, 41
  • [46] Parameter Optimization Design Considering the Stability of the Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Zhai C.
    Wang J.
    Ma Y.
    Feng Z.
    Ren X.
    Ding C.
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59 (23): : 331 - 342
  • [47] Extruded diameter dependence on temperature and velocity in the fused deposition modeling process
    Mbow, Mouhamadou Mansour
    Marin, Philippe Rene
    Pourroy, Franck
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 5 (02) : 139 - 152
  • [48] Experimental Investigation and Prediction of Mechanical Properties in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Tura, Amanuel Diriba
    Lemu, Hirpa G.
    Mamo, Hana Beyene
    CRYSTALS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [49] Extruded diameter dependence on temperature and velocity in the fused deposition modeling process
    Mouhamadou Mansour Mbow
    Philippe Rene Marin
    Franck Pourroy
    Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 5 : 139 - 152
  • [50] Deposition angle prediction of Fused Deposition Modeling process using ensemble machine learning
    Hooda, Nishtha
    Chohan, Jasgurpreet Singh
    Gupta, Ruchika
    Kumar, Raman
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2021, 116 : 121 - 128