Extruded diameter dependence on temperature and velocity in the fused deposition modeling process

被引:0
|
作者
Mouhamadou Mansour Mbow
Philippe Rene Marin
Franck Pourroy
机构
[1] University of Grenoble Alpes–G-SCOP Laboratory,
来源
关键词
Fused deposition modeling; Die swell; Shrinkage; Extrusion force; Extrusion velocity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of fused deposition modeling has become increasingly widespread in additive manufacturing. This technique involves the extrusion of a polymer filament through a narrow hole with a given diameter on which the deposited raster characteristics depend. This paper presents an experimental study on the extrudate diameter variations in fused deposition modeling using polylactic acid (PLA). The main parameters influencing the diameter have been identified through a review of the literature. It is stated that the extruded diameter depends on the force applied to the polymer as it enters the extruder hole. This force in turn varies according to the operating temperature and velocity. Above a certain mass flow rate, the polymer filament did not melt enough and a slippage was noticed at the point where the rollers make contact with the filament, preventing the extruding motor from pushing the latter toward the outlet. As a result, the extruded filament had an irregular aspect showing split zones. At high temperatures and low velocities, the extruded filament shrinks due to natural flow under gravity. However, swelling occurs at the die outlet for higher extrusion velocities, i.e., when the extruding force increases. The maximum and minimum values of the extruded diameter are analyzed in relation to the velocity. Additional experiments consisting in printing single-walled parts have also allowed analyzing the effect of the diameter inconsistency on FDM part accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 152
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extruded diameter dependence on temperature and velocity in the fused deposition modeling process
    Mbow, Mouhamadou Mansour
    Marin, Philippe Rene
    Pourroy, Franck
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 5 (02) : 139 - 152
  • [2] Temperature Analysis in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Zhou, Yong
    Xiong, Gang
    Nyberg, Timo
    Liu, Dan
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND CONTROL ENGINEERING (ICISCE), 2016, : 678 - 682
  • [3] Coupling Among Filling Velocity,Layer Thickness and Nozzle Temperature in Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Chen S.
    Chen Y.
    1600, South China University of Technology (48): : 88 - 95
  • [4] Influence of temperature on polymer parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process
    Bhalodi, Deep
    Zalavadiya, Karan
    Gurrala, Pavan Kumar
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 41 (03)
  • [5] Influence of temperature on polymer parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process
    Deep Bhalodi
    Karan Zalavadiya
    Pavan Kumar Gurrala
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2019, 41
  • [6] Research on Curved Layer Fused Deposition Modeling With a Variable Extruded Filament
    Zhao, Donghua
    Guo, Weizhong
    Gao, Feng
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 20 (04)
  • [7] Numerical investigation of the influence of process conditions on the temperature variation in fused deposition modeling
    Zhang, Jie
    Wang, Xin Zhou
    Yu, Wang Wang
    Deng, Yu He
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2017, 130 : 59 - 68
  • [8] Performance assessment of fused deposition modeling process
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman
    Mian, Syed Hammad
    Ameen, Wadea
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [9] Topology optimization for fused deposition modeling process
    Rezaie, R.
    Badrossamay, M.
    Ghaie, A.
    Moosavi, H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ELECTRO PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL MACHINING (ISEM), 2013, 6 : 521 - 526
  • [10] A Review of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Models
    Komarnicki, Piotr
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING, 2017, : 241 - 247