Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process

被引:33
|
作者
Sun, Hongyue [1 ]
Rao, Prahalad K. [2 ]
Kong, Zhenyu [3 ]
Deng, Xinwei [4 ]
Jin, Ran [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Grado Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Stat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Additive manufacturing (AM); functional quantitative and qualitative (QQ) models; fused deposition modeling (FDM); in situ process variables; QQ responses; OF-THE-ART; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; REGRESSION-MODELS; FDM MACHINE; OPTIMIZATION; DISCRETE; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2017.2763609
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables flexible part geometry and functionality, and reduces product development life cycle by direct layer-wise fabrication from CAD files. In the last decade, great achievements are made on AM materials, machines, processes, etc. However, the quality of the AM parts is still questionable for industrial specifications. On the one hand, AM part quality variables can be either quantitative, such as dimensional accuracy, or qualitative, such as binary indicators for voids, missing features, or surface roughness. On the other hand, both offline process setting variables and functional in situ process variables can be measured and modeled with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) quality response variables. In this paper, the QQ quality response variables are modeled by offline process setting variables and in situ process variables via functional QQ models. The modeling of these in situ process variables provides the basis for real-time monitoring and control for AM processes. Simulation studies and experimental data from a fused deposition modeling process are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners-Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have attracted much attention and showed many advantages over the traditional subtractive manufacturing processes. However, the product quality issues make AM intractable for high-quality parts in industrial applications. This paper aims to address the quality issues by modeling both quantitative quality variables, such as dimensional accuracy, and qualitative quality variables, such as the binary (go/no-go) indicator for surface conditions. Both offline process setting variables and in situ process variables are used in the model as predictors. Such a model is important for systematically quality evaluation of AM parts, and provides the basis for future process monitoring and control. The merits of the proposed method are demonstrated with simulation studies and a case study in a fused deposition modeling process.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QQ Models: Joint Modeling for Quantitative and Qualitative Quality Responses in Manufacturing Systems
    Deng, Xinwei
    Jin, Ran
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2015, 57 (03) : 320 - 331
  • [22] An Outline of Fused Deposition Modeling: System Models and Control Strategies
    Martini, Michele
    Scaccia, Massimiliano
    Marchello, Gabriele
    Abidi, Haider
    D'Imperio, Mariapaola
    Cannella, Ferdinando
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [23] Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
    Rajan, Kumaresan
    Samykano, Mahendran
    Kadirgama, Kumaran
    Harun, Wan Sharuzi Wan
    Rahman, Md Mustafizur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 120 (3-4): : 1531 - 1570
  • [24] Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
    Kumaresan Rajan
    Mahendran Samykano
    Kumaran Kadirgama
    Wan Sharuzi Wan Harun
    Md. Mustafizur Rahman
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 120 : 1531 - 1570
  • [25] Process Monitoring of Fused Deposition Modeling through Profile Control
    Wu, Yi
    He, Ketai
    Hu, Huaqing
    Zhao, Xue
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBORG AND BIONIC SYSTEMS (CBS), 2018, : 346 - 350
  • [26] Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene
    Carneiro, O. S.
    Silva, A. F.
    Gomes, R.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2015, 83 : 768 - 776
  • [27] Fused Deposition Modeling in microgravity
    Crockett, R
    Petersen, D
    Cooper, K
    SOLID FREEFORM FABRICATION PROCEEDINGS, AUGUST 1999, 1999, : 671 - 678
  • [28] Fused Deposition Modeling BioPrinter
    Candiotti, Hayin
    Karl, Brian
    Knowles, Kendra
    Mathews, Dana
    Hall, Constance L.
    Mohen, Kyle
    Paliwal, Manish
    2013 39TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC 2013), 2013, : 177 - +
  • [29] Modeling anisotropic sintering for fused deposition modeling of alumina
    Fatima Hammoud
    Jérôme Lecourt
    Christelle Bilot
    Charles Manière
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2025, 137 (5) : 2319 - 2334
  • [30] Modeling and characterization of fused deposition modeling tooling for vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process
    Li, H.
    Taylor, G.
    Bheemreddy, V
    Iyibilgin, O.
    Leu, M.
    Chandrashekhara, K.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2015, 7 : 64 - 72