Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process

被引:33
|
作者
Sun, Hongyue [1 ]
Rao, Prahalad K. [2 ]
Kong, Zhenyu [3 ]
Deng, Xinwei [4 ]
Jin, Ran [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Grado Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Stat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Additive manufacturing (AM); functional quantitative and qualitative (QQ) models; fused deposition modeling (FDM); in situ process variables; QQ responses; OF-THE-ART; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; REGRESSION-MODELS; FDM MACHINE; OPTIMIZATION; DISCRETE; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2017.2763609
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables flexible part geometry and functionality, and reduces product development life cycle by direct layer-wise fabrication from CAD files. In the last decade, great achievements are made on AM materials, machines, processes, etc. However, the quality of the AM parts is still questionable for industrial specifications. On the one hand, AM part quality variables can be either quantitative, such as dimensional accuracy, or qualitative, such as binary indicators for voids, missing features, or surface roughness. On the other hand, both offline process setting variables and functional in situ process variables can be measured and modeled with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) quality response variables. In this paper, the QQ quality response variables are modeled by offline process setting variables and in situ process variables via functional QQ models. The modeling of these in situ process variables provides the basis for real-time monitoring and control for AM processes. Simulation studies and experimental data from a fused deposition modeling process are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners-Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have attracted much attention and showed many advantages over the traditional subtractive manufacturing processes. However, the product quality issues make AM intractable for high-quality parts in industrial applications. This paper aims to address the quality issues by modeling both quantitative quality variables, such as dimensional accuracy, and qualitative quality variables, such as the binary (go/no-go) indicator for surface conditions. Both offline process setting variables and in situ process variables are used in the model as predictors. Such a model is important for systematically quality evaluation of AM parts, and provides the basis for future process monitoring and control. The merits of the proposed method are demonstrated with simulation studies and a case study in a fused deposition modeling process.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design and fabrication of reconstructive mandibular models using fused deposition modeling
    Kouhi, Esfandyar
    Masood, Syed
    Morsi, Yos
    ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION, 2008, 28 (03) : 246 - 254
  • [32] Manufacturing of polymer/metal composites by fused deposition modeling process with polyethylene
    Nabipour, Mojtaba
    Akhoundi, Behnam
    Saed, Arvin Bagheri
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2020, 137 (21)
  • [33] An investigation on the effect of parameters of the process in fused deposition modeling on mechanical characteristics
    Priyanka, Tadikonda
    Ambatipudi, Ravindra
    Prasad, J. Laxmi
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 64 : 452 - 454
  • [34] Process analysis and application for rapid prototyping based on fused deposition modeling
    Yu, Dong-man
    Zhu, Cheng-jun
    Su, Jun
    Wang, Di
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-2, 2011, 179-180 : 875 - 880
  • [35] PROTOTYPE SURFACE MICRO- PRECISION IN FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING PROCESS
    WANG Tianming XI Juntong JIN Ye School of Mechanical Engineering
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2007, (01) : 100 - 106
  • [36] A design methodology for additive manufacturing applied to fused deposition modeling process
    Nicolas, Boyard
    Olivier, Christmann
    Mickael, Rivette
    Simon, Richir
    MECHANICS & INDUSTRY, 2019, 20 (06)
  • [37] Machine Vision based Statistical Process Control in Fused Deposition Modeling
    Wu Yi
    He Ketai
    Zhou Xiaomin
    Ding Wenying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 12TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2017, : 936 - 941
  • [38] An investigation on the effect of parameters of the process in fused deposition modeling on mechanical characteristics
    Priyanka, Tadikonda
    Ambatipudi, Ravindra
    Prasad, J. Laxmi
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 64 : 452 - 454
  • [39] Manufacturing of polymer/metal composites by fused deposition modeling process with polyethylene
    Nabipour, Mojtaba
    Akhoundi, Behnam
    Bagheri Saed, Arvin
    Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2020, 137 (21):
  • [40] Optimization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameters for flexural strength
    Dev, Saty
    Srivastava, Rajeev
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 44 : 3012 - 3016