Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting

被引:52
|
作者
Venta, LA
Hendrick, RE
Adler, YT
DeLeon, P
Mengoni, PM
Scharl, AM
Comstock, CE
Hansen, L
Kay, N
Coveler, A
Cutter, G
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Lynn Sage Comprehens Breast Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO 80214 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761241
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to determine the rates and causes of disageements in interpretation between full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients undergoing diagnostic mammography were invited to participate in the digital mammography study. Three views, selected by the radiologist interpreting the film-screen-mammography, were obtained in both film-screen mammography and digital mammography Radiologists independently assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category to the film-screen mammography and the digital mammography images. The BI-RADS categories were grouped into the general categories of agreement, partial agreement or disagreement. A third and different radiologist reviewed all cases of disagreement, reached a decision as to management, and determined the primary: cause of disagreement. RESULTS. Six radiologists reviewed digital mammography and film-screen mammography diagnostic images in a total of 1147 breasts in 692 patients. Agreement between digital mammography and final film-screen mammography assessment was present in 937 breasts (82%), partial agreement in 159 (14%), and disagreement in 51 (4%), for a kappa value of 0.29. The primary causes of disagreement were differences in management approach of the radiologists (52%), inflammation derived from sonogaphy or additional film-screen mammograms (34%), and technical differences between the two mammographic techniques (10%). CONCLUSION. Significant disagreement between film-screen mammography and digital mammography affecting follow-up management was present in only 4% of breasts. The most frequent cause of disagreement in interpretation was a difference in management approach between radiologists (interobserver variability). This source of variability was larger than that due to differences in lesion visibility; between film-screen mammography and digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography
    U. Fischer
    F. Baum
    S. Obenauer
    S. Luftner-Nagel
    D. von Heyden
    R. Vosshenrich
    E. Grabbe
    [J]. European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 2679 - 2683
  • [32] Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography in comparison with screen film mammography by hard copy images
    Uchiyama, N
    Tajima, H
    Machida, M
    Takahama, K
    Kumazaki, T
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 191 - 191
  • [33] Digital Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Hall, Ferris M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [34] Full-field digital mammography
    Bick, U
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12): : 957 - 964
  • [35] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Funke, M
    Grabbe, EH
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) : 2188 - 2191
  • [36] Full-field digital mammography
    U Bick
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [37] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    K.-P. Hermann
    S. Obenauer
    M. Funke
    E. Grabbe
    [J]. European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 2188 - 2191
  • [38] Intraindividual comparison of full-field-digital-mammography and conventional film-screen mammography for early detection of breast cancer
    Fischmann, A
    Siegmann, K
    Wersebe, A
    Fersis, N
    Claussen, CD
    Müller-Schimpfle, M
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 481 - 485
  • [39] The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units
    Hauge, Ingrid H. R.
    Hogg, Peter
    Szczepura, Katy
    Connolly, Paul
    McGill, George
    Mercer, Claire
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (01) : 263 - 271
  • [40] Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: Comparison in the patients with microcalcifications
    Kim, HS
    Han, BK
    Choo, KS
    Jeon, YH
    Kim, JH
    Choe, YH
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 214 - 220