The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units

被引:20
|
作者
Hauge, Ingrid H. R. [1 ,2 ]
Hogg, Peter [3 ]
Szczepura, Katy [3 ]
Connolly, Paul [4 ]
McGill, George [5 ]
Mercer, Claire [6 ]
机构
[1] Oslo & Akershus Univ Coll Appl Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiog & Dent Technol, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Radiat Protect Author, NO-1332 Osteras, Norway
[3] Univ Salford, Directorate Radiog, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
[4] Integrated Radiol Serv Ltd, Liverpool L3 4BJ, Merseyside, England
[5] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[6] Royal Bolton Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bolton BL4 0JR, England
关键词
mammography; breast thickness; breast compression; COMPRESSED BREAST THICKNESS; DENSITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1118/1.3663579
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish a simple method to determine breast readout accuracy on mammography units. Methods: A thickness measuring device (TMD) was used in conjunction with a breast phantom. This phantom had compression characteristics similar to human female breast tissue. The phantom was compressed, and the thickness was measured using TMD and mammography unit readout. Measurements were performed on a range of screen film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units (8 units in total; 6 different models/manufacturers) for two different sized paddles and two different compression forces (60 and 100 N). Results: The difference between machine readout and TMD for the breast area, when applying 100 N compression force, for nonflexible paddles was largest for GE Senographe DMR+ (24 cm x 30 cm paddle: +14.3%). For flexible paddles the largest difference occurred for Hologic Lorad Selenia (18 cm x 24 cm paddle: +26.0%). Conclusions: None of the units assessed were found to have perfect correlation between measured and readout thickness. TMD measures and thickness readouts were different for the duplicate units from two different models/manufacturers. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3663579]
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 271
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Hall, Ferris M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [2] Comparison of the microcalcifications between full-field digital mammography and screen film mammography
    Tohno, E
    Kujiraoka, Y
    Watanabe, Y
    Itai, Y
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 189 - 189
  • [3] Breast mass classification on full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography
    Shi, Jiazheng
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Ge, Jun
    Wei, Jun
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 371 - 377
  • [4] Full-field digital mammography in comparison to screen-film mammography - A phantom study
    Obenauer, S
    Schorn, C
    Funke, M
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    Hermann, KP
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 499 - 503
  • [5] Clinical performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 283
  • [6] Causes of differences between full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography interpretations in the Colorado/Massachusetts full-field digital mammography screening trial
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, P
    Moss, LJ
    Hendrick, RE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 199 - 199
  • [7] A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Michell, M. J.
    Iqbal, A.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Douiri, A.
    Wilson, R.
    Whelehan, P.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 976 - 981
  • [8] Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Karellas, A
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 671 - 677
  • [9] Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 830 - 834
  • [10] Computer-Aided Detection with Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography
    Melton, A. R.
    Worrell, S. W.
    Knapp, J.
    Hoffmeister, J. W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)