Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting

被引:52
|
作者
Venta, LA
Hendrick, RE
Adler, YT
DeLeon, P
Mengoni, PM
Scharl, AM
Comstock, CE
Hansen, L
Kay, N
Coveler, A
Cutter, G
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Lynn Sage Comprehens Breast Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO 80214 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761241
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to determine the rates and causes of disageements in interpretation between full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients undergoing diagnostic mammography were invited to participate in the digital mammography study. Three views, selected by the radiologist interpreting the film-screen-mammography, were obtained in both film-screen mammography and digital mammography Radiologists independently assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category to the film-screen mammography and the digital mammography images. The BI-RADS categories were grouped into the general categories of agreement, partial agreement or disagreement. A third and different radiologist reviewed all cases of disagreement, reached a decision as to management, and determined the primary: cause of disagreement. RESULTS. Six radiologists reviewed digital mammography and film-screen mammography diagnostic images in a total of 1147 breasts in 692 patients. Agreement between digital mammography and final film-screen mammography assessment was present in 937 breasts (82%), partial agreement in 159 (14%), and disagreement in 51 (4%), for a kappa value of 0.29. The primary causes of disagreement were differences in management approach of the radiologists (52%), inflammation derived from sonogaphy or additional film-screen mammograms (34%), and technical differences between the two mammographic techniques (10%). CONCLUSION. Significant disagreement between film-screen mammography and digital mammography affecting follow-up management was present in only 4% of breasts. The most frequent cause of disagreement in interpretation was a difference in management approach between radiologists (interobserver variability). This source of variability was larger than that due to differences in lesion visibility; between film-screen mammography and digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Karellas, A
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 671 - 677
  • [22] Film-screen and digital mammography artifacts
    Ayyar, GP
    Whitman, GJ
    Geiser, W
    Sprinkle-Vincent, S
    Sullivan, C
    Stephens, TW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 73 - 73
  • [23] Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 830 - 834
  • [24] Computer-Aided Detection with Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography
    Melton, A. R.
    Worrell, S. W.
    Knapp, J.
    Hoffmeister, J. W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [25] Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography
    Gennaro, Gisella
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (11) : 2559 - 2566
  • [26] Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography
    Gisella Gennaro
    Cosimo di Maggio
    [J]. European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 2559 - 2566
  • [27] Comparison of full-field digital and screen-film mammography dose
    Schueler, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2005 - 2005
  • [28] Repeat Rates and Their Effect on Dose in Transitioning from Screen/Film to Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Ripley, E.
    Otto, P.
    Hatab, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [29] Does full-field digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to comparable screening performance parameters as film-screen mammography?
    Van Ongeval, C.
    Van Steen, A.
    Marchal, G.
    Zanca, F.
    Bosmans, H.
    Van Limbergen, E.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (03): : 239 - 239
  • [30] Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography
    Fischer, U
    Baum, F
    Obenauer, S
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    von Heyden, D
    Vosshenrich, R
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (11) : 2679 - 2683