Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography

被引:33
|
作者
Gennaro, Gisella
di Maggio, Cosimo
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Oncol & Surg Sci, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Dept Phys, Padua Unit, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
mammography; digital mammography; dosimetry in mammography; average glandular dose;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-006-0314-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The study purpose was the comparison between doses delivered by a full-field digital mammography system and a screen/film mammography unit, both using the same type of X-ray tube. Exposure parameters and breast thickness were collected for 300 screen/film (GE Senographe DMR) and 296 digital mammograms (GE Senographe 2000D). The entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was calculated from anode/filter combination, kV(p) and mAs values and breast thickness, by simulating spectra through a program based on a catalogue of experimental X-ray spectra. The average glandular dose (AGD) was also computed. Results showed an overall reduction of average glandular dose by 27% of digital over screen/film mammography. The dose saving was about 15% for thin and thick breasts, while it was between 30% and 40% for intermediate thicknesses. Full-field digital mammography dose reduction is allowed by wider dynamic range and higher efficiency of digital detector, which can be exposed at higher energy spectra than screen/film mammography, and by the separation between acquisition and displaying processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2559 / 2566
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography
    Gisella Gennaro
    Cosimo di Maggio
    [J]. European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 2559 - 2566
  • [2] Comparison of full-field digital and screen-film mammography dose
    Schueler, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2005 - 2005
  • [3] Comparison of the microcalcifications between full-field digital mammography and screen film mammography
    Tohno, E
    Kujiraoka, Y
    Watanabe, Y
    Itai, Y
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 189 - 189
  • [4] Full-field digital mammography in comparison to screen-film mammography - A phantom study
    Obenauer, S
    Schorn, C
    Funke, M
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    Hermann, KP
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 499 - 503
  • [5] Clinical performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 283
  • [6] A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Michell, M. J.
    Iqbal, A.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Douiri, A.
    Wilson, R.
    Whelehan, P.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 976 - 981
  • [7] Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Karellas, A
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 671 - 677
  • [8] Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 830 - 834
  • [9] Causes of differences between full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography interpretations in the Colorado/Massachusetts full-field digital mammography screening trial
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, P
    Moss, LJ
    Hendrick, RE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 199 - 199
  • [10] Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography
    Mitsutomi Ishiyama
    Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu
    Mari Kikuchi
    Yukihisa Saida
    Sonoe Hiramatsu
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2009, 16 : 58 - 61