Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level

被引:58
|
作者
Dowell, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Rohm & Haas Co, Deer Pk, TX 77536 USA
关键词
alarm systems; design guidelines; documentation; emergency shutdown system; fault tree analysis; final element; instrumentation; interlocks; modeling; probability of failure on demand; qualitative; quantitative; reliability; reliability data; safety; sensors; standards; systems design; unavailability;
D O I
10.1016/S0019-0578(98)00018-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes the Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) method for determining the needed SIL (Safety Integrity Level) of a SIS (Safety Instrumented System). The paper also shows the relationship of LOPA to other analysis methods for safety system requirements. Building on the CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety) Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes, this paper shows how to determine if additional safeguards are needed and how to determine the needed SIL of a SIS. LOPA is a tool that can be used after the HAZOP (HAZard and OPerability Analysis), but before using fault tree analysis or quantitative risk analysis. Using a multi-disciplined team, the consequences identified in the HAZOP are listed as impact events and are classified for severity level. The initiating causes are listed for each impact event and a likelihood is estimated for each initiating cause. Independent Protection Layers (IPLs) are listed, including process design, basic process control system, alarms and procedures, safety instrumented systems, and additional mitigation. Each IPL is assigned a Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD). A mitigated event likelihood is calculated by multiplying the initiating cause likelihood by the PFDs for the applicable IPLs. The mitigated event likelihood is then compared to a criterion linked to the corporation's criteria for unacceptable risk levels. Additional IPLs can be added to reduce the risk. The mitigated event likelihoods are summed to give an estimate of the risk for the whole process. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 165
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determining water level management strategies for lake protection at the ecosystem level
    Yang, Ying
    Yin, Xin'an
    Chen, He
    Yang, Zhifeng
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2014, 738 (01) : 111 - 127
  • [42] Determining water level management strategies for lake protection at the ecosystem level
    Ying Yang
    Xin’an Yin
    He Chen
    Zhifeng Yang
    Hydrobiologia, 2014, 738 : 111 - 127
  • [43] Determining Acceptable Level of Safety of Approach to Landing
    Kraus, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE TRANSPORT MEANS 2016, 2016, : 230 - 235
  • [44] Burner Management System Safety Integrity Level selection
    Scott, MD
    ISA 2002 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE, VOL LVII, PT 1, 2002, 422 : 535 - 546
  • [45] The ins and outs of safety integrity level reliability calculations
    Mostia, William
    Control, 2020, 33 (11):
  • [46] Determination of Safety Integrity Level of Ammonia Refrigeration System
    Li L.
    Xu K.-L.
    Wang B.
    Yao X.-W.
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2019, 40 (07): : 1034 - 1038
  • [47] Confirming the safety instrumented system layer of protection
    Chastain-Knight, Denise
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2020, 39 (01)
  • [48] A mathematical optimization model for determining safety integrity levels in process facilities
    Cheraghi, Morteza
    Taghipour, Sharareh
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 243
  • [49] Avoiding pitfalls in determining quantitative safety integrity levels for batch processes
    Bhuta, N
    ISA 2002 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE, VOL LVII, PT 1, 2002, 422 : 527 - 534
  • [50] Quantitative Assessment for Software Safety Integrity Level Based on Functional Safety Standards
    Nishikawa, Takahiro
    Fujiwara, Takaji
    Yamada, Shigeru
    PROCEEDINGS 18TH ISSAT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY & QUALITY IN DESIGN, 2012, : 283 - +