Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level

被引:58
|
作者
Dowell, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Rohm & Haas Co, Deer Pk, TX 77536 USA
关键词
alarm systems; design guidelines; documentation; emergency shutdown system; fault tree analysis; final element; instrumentation; interlocks; modeling; probability of failure on demand; qualitative; quantitative; reliability; reliability data; safety; sensors; standards; systems design; unavailability;
D O I
10.1016/S0019-0578(98)00018-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes the Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) method for determining the needed SIL (Safety Integrity Level) of a SIS (Safety Instrumented System). The paper also shows the relationship of LOPA to other analysis methods for safety system requirements. Building on the CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety) Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes, this paper shows how to determine if additional safeguards are needed and how to determine the needed SIL of a SIS. LOPA is a tool that can be used after the HAZOP (HAZard and OPerability Analysis), but before using fault tree analysis or quantitative risk analysis. Using a multi-disciplined team, the consequences identified in the HAZOP are listed as impact events and are classified for severity level. The initiating causes are listed for each impact event and a likelihood is estimated for each initiating cause. Independent Protection Layers (IPLs) are listed, including process design, basic process control system, alarms and procedures, safety instrumented systems, and additional mitigation. Each IPL is assigned a Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD). A mitigated event likelihood is calculated by multiplying the initiating cause likelihood by the PFDs for the applicable IPLs. The mitigated event likelihood is then compared to a criterion linked to the corporation's criteria for unacceptable risk levels. Additional IPLs can be added to reduce the risk. The mitigated event likelihoods are summed to give an estimate of the risk for the whole process. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 165
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Layer of protection analysis as auxiliary technique in process safety incident investigations
    Pawolocki, Fernando Javier
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2021, 40 (S1) : S13 - S23
  • [32] Techniques for assigning a target safety integrity level
    Summers, AE
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 1998, 37 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [33] Assessing the safety of integrity level partitioning in software
    McDermid, JA
    Pumfrey, DJ
    LESSONS IN SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, : 134 - 152
  • [34] Evaluation of Uncertainty in Safety Integrity Level Calculations
    Freeman, Raymond Randy
    Summers, Angela
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2016, 35 (04) : 341 - 348
  • [35] Computer architectures and safety integrity level apportionment
    Jansen, H
    Schäbe, H
    COMPUTERS IN RAILWAY SIX, 2004, 15 : 293 - 302
  • [36] Hazard & operability study and determining safety integrity level on sulfur furnace unit: A case study in fertilizer industry
    Noriyati, Ronny Dwi
    Rozaaq, Wisnu
    Musyafa, Ali
    Soepriyanto, Adi
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND SERVICE SCIENCE 2015, IESS 2015, 2015, 4 : 231 - 236
  • [37] Quantifying the reliability level of system integrity protection schemes
    Panteli, Mathaios
    Crossley, Peter A.
    Fitch, John
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2014, 8 (04) : 753 - 764
  • [38] Layer of Protection Analysis
    Willey, Ronald J.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 84 : 12 - 22
  • [39] A Unified Model for Evaluating the Safety Integrity Level of Safety Instrumented Systems
    Bukowski, Julia V.
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2008 PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 139 - 144
  • [40] Overcoming challenges in using layers of protection analysis (LOPA) to determine safety integrity levels (SILs)
    Baybutt, Paul
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 48 : 32 - 40