A mathematical optimization model for determining safety integrity levels in process facilities

被引:2
|
作者
Cheraghi, Morteza [1 ]
Taghipour, Sharareh [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Mech Ind & Mechatron Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Safety instrumented systems; Safety instrumented functions; Safety integrity level; Mathematical optimization; Genetic algorithm; Societal risk; Individual risk; Risk tolerance criteria; RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; SIL DETERMINATION; ALLOCATION; SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; LAYERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109896
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In process industries, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs) are implemented to meet government-mandated risk tolerance criteria, which aim to ensure the safety of both individuals and society. The level of risk reduction achieved by a SIF is quantified by its Safety Integrity Level (SIL). Determining the target SILs is a challenging task for facility owners as they must balance the costs and benefits of risk reduction while complying with regulatory requirements. Furthermore, governments define risk tolerance criteria for an overall facility rather than for single scenarios. Therefore, determining a set of SILs for all SIFs becomes imperative to collectively reduce both individual and societal risks to tolerable levels intended for the overall facility. In this paper, we propose a mathematical optimization model to determine the most beneficial collection of SILs that guarantees meeting the risk tolerance criteria. Our model considers both individual and societal risk perspectives and effectively models an overall facility. The proposed model is applied to a process facility and the results are compared with the results from the existing methods for SIL determination. The results demonstrate the model's superior effectiveness in helping owners to select the most beneficial target SILs while ensuring compliance with government requirements.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining the required safety integrity level for your process
    Beckman, L
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 1998, 37 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [2] Integrated Framework for Determining Safety Integrity Level for Improved Process Safety
    Dan, Seungkyu
    Kim, Jaeha
    Kim, Ik Hyun
    Cho, Sunghyun
    Yoon, En Sup
    Shin, Dongil
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2015, 48 (09) : 742 - 755
  • [3] Safety integrity levels model for IEC 61508
    Kato, E
    Sato, Y
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2787 - 2793
  • [4] Avoiding pitfalls in determining quantitative safety integrity levels for batch processes
    Bhuta, N
    ISA 2002 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE, VOL LVII, PT 1, 2002, 422 : 527 - 534
  • [5] DETERMINING SAFE LEVELS OF EXPOSURE - SAFETY FACTORS OR MATHEMATICAL-MODELS
    KREWSKI, D
    BROWN, C
    MURDOCH, D
    FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (03): : S383 - S394
  • [6] MATHEMATICAL-MODEL FOR DETERMINING THE COMPOSITION OF COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN COMPUTER-NETWORKS
    KOVALENKO, NN
    PETRENKO, PA
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1979, 40 (12) : 1850 - 1857
  • [7] Understanding safety integrity levels
    Redmill, F
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 1999, 32 (07): : 197 - 200
  • [8] Understanding safety integrity levels
    Redmill, Felix
    Measurement and Control, 1999, 32 (07): : 197 - 200
  • [9] Vacuum Carburizing Process: Identification of Mathematical Model and Optimization
    Derevyanov, M. Yu
    Livshits, M. Yu
    Yakubovich, E. A.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 2017, 2018, 327
  • [10] Safety integrity levels model for IEC 61508 - Examination of modes of operation
    Kato, E
    Sato, Y
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2000, E83A (05) : 863 - 865