Assessment of Psychological Disturbance in Patients with Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools

被引:18
|
作者
Kudsi, Zaki [1 ]
Fenlon, Michael R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Johal, Ama [5 ,6 ]
Baysan, Aylin [7 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Prosthodont, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent & Special Care Dent Serv, London, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Ctr Lead Bioengn, London, England
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Orthodont, London, England
[7] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Oral Bioengn, London, England
关键词
Psychological disturbance; removable dentures; tooth loss; ANXIETY STRESS SCALES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DEPRESSION SEVERITY; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; HEALTH; VALIDITY; PEOPLE; PHQ-9; DASS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To systematically review the available evidence on screening tools to detect the psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss and technically successful removable dentures (partial and complete). Materials and Methods The study protocol was registered with the National Institute of Health Research Database (I.D. CRD42017082125). The PICOS tool (patients, intervention, control, outcomes measure, and study design) was used to formulate an effective search strategy. Participants were adults (>= 18), who were edentulous or had significant tooth loss (< 9 remaining teeth). The intervention included undergoing replacement with technically successful dentures (partial or complete). A control group of adults were either edentulous or had significant tooth loss and without dentures. Outcomes included assessing psychological disturbance due to treatment with dentures or due to no treatment using a validated tool. A structured search strategy was used to complete a standard systematic search of the electronic database without any date limit and/or language restriction. Only quantitative studies using a validated measuring tool to screen for psychological distress in adults with significant tooth loss were included. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Data homogeneity was assessed in regards to the screening tools to measure psychological disturbance following the management of tooth loss with dentures. The significant level was set at 0.05, using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 (SPSS Inc., New York, NY). The psychometric properties and the validation processes of the screening tools were assessed. Results From the original 3510 studies identified, only eight studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. All eight studies used the same questionnaire to screen for the emotional distress of tooth loss. In addition, one study also used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to screen for the association of depression with tooth loss. Six studies suggested that a significant number of patients have difficulties in accepting tooth loss, were less confident, and had emotional distress related to tooth loss. However, two studies reported no significant link. All studies found a marked impact on functional activities and social interaction. However, four studies had a potentially biased selection process, and the questionnaire used was assessed to be at high-risk of measurement bias, as the development and validation process was not clear. There was also a lack of well-defined control groups in all studies. Conclusion Tooth loss could cause psychological disturbance in some patients. To date, there is a lack of available tools that are suitable to screen and measure psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss. Additional research is required to develop tools to identify and measure such impact and to recommend suitable interventions when needed.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Current Assessment Tools for Walkability: A Systematic Review
    Yan, Hai
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2018, 89 : A28 - A29
  • [42] A Systematic Literature Review of Assessment Tools For Programming Assignments
    Souza, Draylson M.
    Felizardo, Katia R.
    Barbosa, Ellen F.
    2016 IEEE 29TH CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING (CSEE&T), 2016, : 147 - 156
  • [43] Tools assessment and diagnosis to infant colic: a systematic review
    Marques, S. Garcia
    Martinez, R. Chillon
    Zapata, S. Gonzalez
    Salas, M. Rebollo
    Rejano, J. J. Jimenez
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 43 (04) : 481 - 488
  • [44] Paediatric Rational Prescribing: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools
    Corrick, Fenella
    Conroy, Sharon
    Sammons, Helen
    Choonara, Imti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [45] The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review
    Altin, Sibel Vildan
    Finke, Isabelle
    Kautz-Freimuth, Sibylle
    Stock, Stephanie
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [46] The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
    Zhou, Haixia
    Xian, Chengyao
    Zhang, Kai-Jun
    Yang, Zhouwen
    Li, Wei
    Tian, Jing
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2022, 54 (01) : 1646 - 1656
  • [47] Violence Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review of Surveys
    Hurducas, Claudia C.
    Singh, Jay P.
    de Ruiter, Corine
    Petrila, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 13 (03) : 181 - 192
  • [48] Terminology and assessment tools of psychosis: A systematic narrative review
    Seiler, Natalie
    Nguyen, Tony
    Yung, Alison
    O'Donoghue, Brian
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2020, 74 (04) : 226 - 246
  • [49] Microtools: A systematic review of validated assessment tools in microsurgery
    Milling, Robert
    Carolan, David
    Pafitanis, Georgios
    Quinlan, Christine
    Potter, Shirley
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (11): : 4013 - 4022
  • [50] Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Hanna, George B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 202 (04): : 469 - U161