Assessment of Psychological Disturbance in Patients with Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools

被引:18
|
作者
Kudsi, Zaki [1 ]
Fenlon, Michael R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Johal, Ama [5 ,6 ]
Baysan, Aylin [7 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Prosthodont, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent & Special Care Dent Serv, London, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Ctr Lead Bioengn, London, England
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Orthodont, London, England
[7] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Oral Bioengn, London, England
关键词
Psychological disturbance; removable dentures; tooth loss; ANXIETY STRESS SCALES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DEPRESSION SEVERITY; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; HEALTH; VALIDITY; PEOPLE; PHQ-9; DASS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To systematically review the available evidence on screening tools to detect the psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss and technically successful removable dentures (partial and complete). Materials and Methods The study protocol was registered with the National Institute of Health Research Database (I.D. CRD42017082125). The PICOS tool (patients, intervention, control, outcomes measure, and study design) was used to formulate an effective search strategy. Participants were adults (>= 18), who were edentulous or had significant tooth loss (< 9 remaining teeth). The intervention included undergoing replacement with technically successful dentures (partial or complete). A control group of adults were either edentulous or had significant tooth loss and without dentures. Outcomes included assessing psychological disturbance due to treatment with dentures or due to no treatment using a validated tool. A structured search strategy was used to complete a standard systematic search of the electronic database without any date limit and/or language restriction. Only quantitative studies using a validated measuring tool to screen for psychological distress in adults with significant tooth loss were included. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Data homogeneity was assessed in regards to the screening tools to measure psychological disturbance following the management of tooth loss with dentures. The significant level was set at 0.05, using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 (SPSS Inc., New York, NY). The psychometric properties and the validation processes of the screening tools were assessed. Results From the original 3510 studies identified, only eight studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. All eight studies used the same questionnaire to screen for the emotional distress of tooth loss. In addition, one study also used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to screen for the association of depression with tooth loss. Six studies suggested that a significant number of patients have difficulties in accepting tooth loss, were less confident, and had emotional distress related to tooth loss. However, two studies reported no significant link. All studies found a marked impact on functional activities and social interaction. However, four studies had a potentially biased selection process, and the questionnaire used was assessed to be at high-risk of measurement bias, as the development and validation process was not clear. There was also a lack of well-defined control groups in all studies. Conclusion Tooth loss could cause psychological disturbance in some patients. To date, there is a lack of available tools that are suitable to screen and measure psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss. Additional research is required to develop tools to identify and measure such impact and to recommend suitable interventions when needed.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Seizure severity assessment tools for adult epilepsy patients: A systematic review
    Rusli, Rose Aniza
    Bakry, Mohd Makmor
    Shah, Noraida Mohamed
    Jan, Tan Hui
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2023, 142
  • [12] Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools
    Ayerbe, Luis
    Gonzalez, Esteban
    Gallo, Valentina
    Coleman, Claire L.
    Wragg, Andrew
    Robson, John
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2016, 16
  • [13] A Systematic Review of Water Vulnerability Assessment Tools
    Plummer, Ryan
    de Loe, Rob
    Armitage, Derek
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2012, 26 (15) : 4327 - 4346
  • [14] A Systematic Review of Early Writing Assessment Tools
    Buchanan, Katherine L.
    Keller-Margulis, Milena
    Hut, Amanda
    Fan, Weihua
    Mire, Sarah S.
    Schanding Jr, G. Thomas
    EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [15] A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment
    Luxton-Reilly, Andrew
    COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, 19 (04) : 209 - 232
  • [16] Evaluating Cough Assessment Tools A Systematic Review
    Schmit, Kristine M.
    Coeytaux, Remy R.
    Goode, Adam P.
    McCrory, Douglas C.
    Yancy, William S., Jr.
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Heidenfelder, Brooke L.
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    CHEST, 2013, 144 (06) : 1819 - 1826
  • [17] A Systematic Scoping Review on Dignity Assessment Tools
    Lim, Yun Xue
    Quah, Elaine Li Ying
    Chua, Keith Zi Yuan
    Ronggui, Casper Keegan Lin
    Govindasamy, Ranitha
    Ong, Simone Meiqi
    Ong, Eng Koon
    Phua, Gillian Li Gek
    Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (04) : e263 - e284
  • [18] A Systematic Review of Water Vulnerability Assessment Tools
    Ryan Plummer
    Rob de Loë
    Derek Armitage
    Water Resources Management, 2012, 26 : 4327 - 4346
  • [19] Cognitive assessment tools in Asia: a systematic review
    Rosli, Roshaslina
    Tan, Maw Pin
    Gray, William Keith
    Subramanian, Pathmawathi
    Chin, Ai-Vyrn
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2016, 28 (02) : 189 - 210
  • [20] School Psychological Assessment Practices: A Systematic Review
    Maluf, Rafael Gustavo
    Lamego Lopes, Joao Armenio
    Oliveira, Celia R. G.
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA, 2022, 1 (62): : 185 - 215