Assessment of Psychological Disturbance in Patients with Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools

被引:18
|
作者
Kudsi, Zaki [1 ]
Fenlon, Michael R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Johal, Ama [5 ,6 ]
Baysan, Aylin [7 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Prosthodont, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent & Special Care Dent Serv, London, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Ctr Lead Bioengn, London, England
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Orthodont, London, England
[7] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Oral Bioengn, London, England
关键词
Psychological disturbance; removable dentures; tooth loss; ANXIETY STRESS SCALES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DEPRESSION SEVERITY; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; HEALTH; VALIDITY; PEOPLE; PHQ-9; DASS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To systematically review the available evidence on screening tools to detect the psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss and technically successful removable dentures (partial and complete). Materials and Methods The study protocol was registered with the National Institute of Health Research Database (I.D. CRD42017082125). The PICOS tool (patients, intervention, control, outcomes measure, and study design) was used to formulate an effective search strategy. Participants were adults (>= 18), who were edentulous or had significant tooth loss (< 9 remaining teeth). The intervention included undergoing replacement with technically successful dentures (partial or complete). A control group of adults were either edentulous or had significant tooth loss and without dentures. Outcomes included assessing psychological disturbance due to treatment with dentures or due to no treatment using a validated tool. A structured search strategy was used to complete a standard systematic search of the electronic database without any date limit and/or language restriction. Only quantitative studies using a validated measuring tool to screen for psychological distress in adults with significant tooth loss were included. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Data homogeneity was assessed in regards to the screening tools to measure psychological disturbance following the management of tooth loss with dentures. The significant level was set at 0.05, using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 (SPSS Inc., New York, NY). The psychometric properties and the validation processes of the screening tools were assessed. Results From the original 3510 studies identified, only eight studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. All eight studies used the same questionnaire to screen for the emotional distress of tooth loss. In addition, one study also used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to screen for the association of depression with tooth loss. Six studies suggested that a significant number of patients have difficulties in accepting tooth loss, were less confident, and had emotional distress related to tooth loss. However, two studies reported no significant link. All studies found a marked impact on functional activities and social interaction. However, four studies had a potentially biased selection process, and the questionnaire used was assessed to be at high-risk of measurement bias, as the development and validation process was not clear. There was also a lack of well-defined control groups in all studies. Conclusion Tooth loss could cause psychological disturbance in some patients. To date, there is a lack of available tools that are suitable to screen and measure psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss. Additional research is required to develop tools to identify and measure such impact and to recommend suitable interventions when needed.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools
    Brusselaers, Nele
    Pirayesh, Ali
    Hoeksema, Henk
    Verbelen, Jozef
    Blot, Stijn
    Monstrey, Stan
    BURNS, 2010, 36 (08) : 1157 - 1164
  • [22] Pain assessment for people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews of pain assessment tools
    Valentina Lichtner
    Dawn Dowding
    Philip Esterhuizen
    S José Closs
    Andrew F Long
    Anne Corbett
    Michelle Briggs
    BMC Geriatrics, 14
  • [23] Pain assessment for people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews of pain assessment tools
    Lichtner, Valentina
    Dowding, Dawn
    Esterhuizen, Philip
    Closs, S. Jose
    Long, Andrew F.
    Corbett, Anne
    Briggs, Michelle
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2014, 14
  • [24] Assessment and screening tools for childbirth-related psychological trauma in nursing practice - A systematic review
    Teil, Olivier
    Roux, Nathalie Le
    Begue, Anthony
    Lefebvre, Aline
    BMC NURSING, 2025, 24 (01):
  • [25] A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews of Validated Dietary Assessment Tools
    Hooson, J.
    Hancock, N.
    Greenwood, D. C.
    Robinson, S.
    Burley, V. J.
    Roe, M.
    Steer, T.
    Wark, P. A.
    Cade, J. E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2016, 75 (OCE3) : E239 - E239
  • [26] Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools
    Richardson, Alison
    Medina, Jibby
    Brown, Vivienne
    Sitzia, John
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2007, 15 (10) : 1125 - 1144
  • [27] Patients’ needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools
    Alison Richardson
    Jibby Medina
    Vivienne Brown
    John Sitzia
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007, 15 : 1125 - 1144
  • [28] HOLISTIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN BRAIN CANCER PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AVAILABLE TOOLS
    Afseth, Janyne
    Neubeck, Lis
    Karatzias, Thanos
    Grant, Robin
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 : 12 - 12
  • [29] Systematic Review of Frailty Assessment Tools for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
    Khalaf, Dina
    Berg, Tobias
    Hillis, Chris
    Kouroukis, Tom
    Leber, Brian
    Lee, Justin
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2020, 20 : S200 - S200
  • [30] Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review
    Oliver, C. M.
    Walker, E.
    Giannaris, S.
    Grocott, M. P. W.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (06) : 849 - 860